Objective Mirror patterns are incidental types that accompany the analysis of the oligoclonal band (OCB) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). However, their interpretation remains controversial. In this study, we analyzed all graphic results of mirror patterns from 86 patients to provide an optimal interpretation scheme for mirror patterns. Methods Matched CSF and serum specimens were obtained from patients with various neurological disorders that required OCB analysis. A total of 86 patients were screened and serum immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE) was performed in all 86. The interobserver agreement for interpreting mirror patterns by visual inspection was tested. The method agreement between the visual inspection and IFE was also evaluated. The CSF/serum albumin quotient (QALB) was calculated to determine the blood-brain barrier integrity of all patients. Results Of the 86 patients with mirror patterns, 19.8% (17/86) had typical mirror bands and most (80.2%) had atypical mirror bands. There was a good agreement between the 2 observers in interpreting typical mirror patterns. However, kappa statistics analysis showed poor agreement regarding the interpretation of atypical mirror bands by visual observation alone (kappa value, -0.026 to 0.314 between 2 observers). The disagreement was pronounced between the visual inspection and validation of IFE (kappa value, -0.0238 to 0.176 between the first observer and IFE; -0.322 to 0.118 between the second observer and IFE). The normal QALB rates in the type V groups were significantly higher than those in the type IV group and the positive QALB rates in the type IV were significantly higher than those in the type V. Conclusion Visual inspection to interpret mirror pattern bands is unreliable. Considering the completely different clinical significance between type IV and type V and high risk of potential misinterpretations, it is necessary to perform IFE on all the atypical mirror types to discriminate atypical type IV from atypical type V.