当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Transcarotid versus transfemoral access for cerebrovascular intervention: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]Department of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China [2]China International Neuroscience Institute (China-INI), Beijing, China [3]Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China [4]Department of Neurology, Tianjin Baodi Hospital, Tianjin, China [5]Health Science Center, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Shaanxi, China [6]Medical Library, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China [7]Department of Interventional Radiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
出处:
ISSN:

摘要:
Cerebrovascular intervention is an excellent option to treat cerebrovascular diseases. Interventional access is a prerequisite and a foundation for cerebrovascular intervention, which is crucial to the success of an intervention. Although transfemoral arterial access (TFA) has become a popular and acceptable method of access for cerebrovascular angiography and intervention in clinical practice, it has some drawbacks that limit the usage in cerebrovascular interventions. Therefore, transcarotid arterial access (TCA) has been developed in cerebrovascular interventions. We aim to conduct a systematic review to compare the safety and efficacy of TCA with TFA for cerebrovascular intervention.In this protocol, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols were followed. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials will be searched mainly from 1 January 2004, to the formal search date. Additionally, reference lists and clinical trial registries will be searched. We will include clinical trials with more than 30 participants, which reported the endpoints of stroke, death and myocardial infarction. Two investigators will independently select studies, extract data and assess bias risk. A standardised mean difference with 95% CI will be presented for continuous data, and a risk ratio with 95% CI will be presented for dichotomous data. On inclusion of sufficient studies, subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis will be conducted. The funnel plot and Egger's test will be used to assess publication bias.As only published sources will be used in this review, ethical approval is not required. We will publish the results in a peer-reviewed journal.CRD42022316468.© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

基金:
语种:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2022]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 医学:内科
最新[2023]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 医学:内科
JCR分区:
出版当年[2021]版:
Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
最新[2023]版:
Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2021版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2020版] 出版后一年[2022版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Department of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China [2]China International Neuroscience Institute (China-INI), Beijing, China
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]Department of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China [2]China International Neuroscience Institute (China-INI), Beijing, China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:16461 今日访问量:0 总访问量:871 更新日期:2025-01-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 首都医科大学宣武医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:北京市西城区长椿街45号宣武医院