当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Long-term follow-up of phenobarbital versus valproate for generalized convulsive status epilepticus in adults: A randomized clinical trial

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Brain Injury Evaluation Quality Control Center, National Center for Neurological Disorders and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, Beijing 10053, China
出处:
ISSN:

摘要:
Intravenous phenobarbital is frequently offered to patients with generalized convulsive status epilepticus (GCSE) in China, but its long-term benefits are unclear. We aimed to evaluate the long-term effects of intravenous phenobarbital on adult patients with GCSE.This randomized clinical trial with a 12-month follow-up was performed in Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University (Beijing, China) between February 2011 and December 2021. After the failure of intravenous diazepam treatment, adult patients with GCSE were randomized to receive either intravenous phenobarbital or valproate. Neurological outcome within 12-month was dichotomized as good (modified Rankin scale, mRS 0-2) or poor (mRS 3-6). Cognitive function was measured by mini-mental state examination (MMSE) and Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA). Hamilton anxiety scale (HAMA) and Hamilton depression scale (HAMD) were tested for mood disorders.We consecutively recruited 166 patients with GCSE. After excluding individuals with termination after intravenous diazepam (n = 61), and with other exclusion criteria (n = 7), 98 patients were included and 88.0% (66/75) of survivors achieved seizure freedom at 12-month. Forty-five patients (45.92%) had good outcomes at 3-month and 57 patients (58.16%) had good outcomes at 12-month. And 46.67% (35/75) of survivors showed mRS improvement at 12-month (phenobarbital group, n = 17 vs. valproate group, n = 18, P = 0.321). Despite there was no significant difference with respect to good outcomes at 3-month (54.0% vs. 37.5%, P = 0.101), the rate of good outcomes in phenobarbital group was higher than valproate group at 12-month (68.0% vs. 47.92%, P = 0.044). A total of 43 patients successfully participated cognitive and emotional tests. Mild cognitive impairment was found in 7.14% of phenobarbital group and 50.0% in valproate group (P = 0.026). In addition, there were no significant differences with respect to anxiety (36.36% vs. 38.10%) and depression (31.82% vs. 47.62%) between the phenobarbital and valproate groups.Combined with long term conventional therapy, intravenous phenobarbital group had more good outcomes than intravenous valproate group in Chinese adult patients with GCSE up to 12-month follow-up. This finding may prompt the option of intravenous phenobarbital especially in patients with limited access to new antiseizure drugs.Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

基金:
语种:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2022]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 临床神经病学
最新[2023]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 临床神经病学
JCR分区:
出版当年[2021]版:
Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
最新[2023]版:
Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2021版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2020版] 出版后一年[2022版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Brain Injury Evaluation Quality Control Center, National Center for Neurological Disorders and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, Beijing 10053, China
通讯作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:16409 今日访问量:0 总访问量:869 更新日期:2025-01-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 首都医科大学宣武医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:北京市西城区长椿街45号宣武医院