当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Angioarchitecture Classification and Treatment Modalities of Craniocervical Junction Arteriovenous Fistulas: A Cohort Study of 155 Patients

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]Department of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. [2]China International Neuroscience Institute (China-INI), Beijing, China.
出处:
ISSN:

摘要:
Craniocervical junction (CCJ) arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) are rare. Variability in clinical manifestations and treatment strategies for CCJ AVFs stems from differences in their angioarchitecture. Our study aims to categorize CCJ AVFs based on their angioarchitecture and explore the associated clinical features and treatment modalities for distinct CCJ AVF types.The authors conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with CCJ AVFs treated at a single neurosurgical facility over the past decade. These patients were classified based on the angioarchitecture of their CCJ AVFs. The analysis included an evaluation of angioarchitecture, clinical characteristics, treatment strategies, and outcomes.The study included 155 patients, with a median age of 56 years, collectively manifesting 165 CCJ AVFs. Our classification identified 4 distinct CCJ AVF types: epidural AVFs (19 [11.5%]), dural AVFs (98 [59.4%]), radicular AVFs (33 [20.0%]), and perimedullary AVFs (15 [9.1%]). Further differentiation was applied based on the presence of pial feeders. The predominant fistula location was at cervical-1 (77.0%). Ascending intradural drainage (52.7%) and descending intradural drainage (52.1%) were frequently observed drainage patterns. Patients with dural AVF predominantly presented with venous hypertensive myelopathy, whereas patients with other types of CCJ AVFs showed a higher incidence of subarachnoid hemorrhage (P = .012). Microsurgery was the predominant treatment, applied in the management of 126 (76.4%) AVFs, whereas 8 (4.8%) AVFs exclusively underwent interventional embolization and 25 (15.2%) received a combination of interventional embolization and microsurgical treatment.CCJ AVFs can be distinguished based on the fistula location and the arterial feeders. Currently, microsurgery stands as the preferred treatment strategy for CCJ AVFs, whereas interventional embolization plays a distinctive role in cases with specific angioarchitecture or as a pretreatment measure before microsurgery.Copyright © Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2024. All rights reserved.

语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2023]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 2 区 临床神经病学 2 区 外科
最新[2023]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 2 区 临床神经病学 2 区 外科
JCR分区:
出版当年[2022]版:
Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Q1 SURGERY
最新[2023]版:
Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Q1 SURGERY

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2022版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2021版] 出版后一年[2023版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Department of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. [2]China International Neuroscience Institute (China-INI), Beijing, China.
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]Department of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. [2]China International Neuroscience Institute (China-INI), Beijing, China.
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:16409 今日访问量:0 总访问量:869 更新日期:2025-01-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 首都医科大学宣武医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:北京市西城区长椿街45号宣武医院