当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Fertility-sparing surgery versus radical surgery for micropapillary serous borderline ovarian tumours: a systematic review protocol

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]Capital Med Univ, Xuanwu Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Beijing, Peoples R China [2]Peoples Liberat Army Gen Hosp, Med Ctr 6, Obstet & Gynecol, Beijing, Peoples R China [3]Capital Med Univ, Xuanwu Hosp, Lib, Beijing, Peoples R China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: SURGERY Prognosis Gynaecological oncology Maternal medicine

摘要:
Introduction Micropapillary serous borderline ovarian tumours (MP-SBOTs) are an aggressive subtype of serous borderline ovarian tumours (SBOTs). Surgery is the mainstay of treatment. Radical surgery (RS, including debulking) is an alternative. However, for patients who are of reproductive age, another treatment option is fertility-sparing surgery (FSS). Up to now, the best surgical approach for MP-SBOTs and whether different procedures will have an impact on postoperative recurrence are still up for debate. This protocol outlines a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate whether FSS adversely affected outcomes compared with RS in patients with MP-SBOTs. Additionally, we will do a prognosis analysis of BOTs with no microcapillary pattern and MP-SOBTs, if possible.Methods and analysis This protocol will consider non-randomised studies comparing outcomes in patients with MP-SBOTs treated with RS or FSS. The following databases will be searched: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE, Embase Medline, PubMed, Web of Science, China Biological Medicine Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Wan Fang database. We will try our best to search the grey literature to avoid missing crucial research. Data collection and extraction will be performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies of intervention will be used to assess non-randomized studies. We will assess the certainty of the evidence using the GRADEpro methodology and describe the degree of certainty of our results using suggested wording based on the GRADEpro assessment. We will conduct a meta-analysis and offer summary statistics for each result if there is enough data available. Instead, we will report the findings narratively where the data do not permit a statistical assessment.Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval was not required for this study. Results will be published through a peer-reviewed publication and communicated at scientific events once complete.PROSPERO registration number CRD42023439136.

基金:
语种:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2023]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 医学:内科
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 医学:内科
JCR分区:
出版当年[2022]版:
Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
最新[2023]版:
Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2022版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2021版] 出版后一年[2023版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Capital Med Univ, Xuanwu Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Beijing, Peoples R China
通讯作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:16996 今日访问量:0 总访问量:905 更新日期:2025-04-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 首都医科大学宣武医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:北京市西城区长椿街45号宣武医院