当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Clinical features and outcomes of basilar invagination

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]Capital Med Univ, Xuanwu Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Changchun St 45th, Beijing, Peoples R China [2]China Int Neurosci Inst China INI, Spine Ctr, Beijing, Peoples R China [3]Capital Med Univ, Xuanwu Hosp, Lab Spinal Cord Injury & Funct Reconstruct, Beijing, Peoples R China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: Basilar invagination Radiological features Symptomatology

摘要:
Basilar invagination has been classified into two types by Goel: Type A is defined mechanical instability of the atlantoaxial joint with upward displacement of the odontoid process while Type B is characterized by stable atlantoaxial joints. This study reviews the association between radiological features and symptomatology and prognosis of two types of basilar invagination for better clinical management. A retrospective analysis was conducted including 141 patients diagnosed with basilar invagination who underwent surgical treatment from January 2016 to December 2020. The neurological function was assessed by the JOA scores, and Short-Form 12 scores. Logistic univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to predict prognostic risk factors. Type A patients (21/101, 20.8%) with more cases of dizziness, lower preoperative JOA scores and SF-12 PCS scores (JOA, 13.0 vs. 13.9, P = 0.042; SF-12 PCS, 37.48 vs. 38.42, P = 0.034) compared to type B (2/40, 5%) (P = 0.022). Type B (22/40, 55%) with more cases of ataxia than type A (35/101, 34.7%) (P = 0.026). Patients with type B demonstrated a significantly higher improvement rate in SF-12 PCS than type A (P = 0.018). Further logistic regression revealed that onset age >= 45 years (OR 4.654, 95% CI 1.645-13.165; p = 0.004) and basal angle >= 125 degrees (OR 28.139, 95% CI 1.090-726.239; p = 0.044) were independent risk factors for type A and type B, respectively. Type A patients with more cases of dizziness, and type B patients with more cases of ataxia, can achieve better long-term prognosis following clinical intervention.

基金:
语种:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2023]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 临床神经病学 3 区 外科
最新[2023]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 临床神经病学 3 区 外科
JCR分区:
出版当年[2022]版:
Q2 SURGERY Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
最新[2023]版:
Q1 SURGERY Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2022版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2021版] 出版后一年[2023版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Capital Med Univ, Xuanwu Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Changchun St 45th, Beijing, Peoples R China [3]Capital Med Univ, Xuanwu Hosp, Lab Spinal Cord Injury & Funct Reconstruct, Beijing, Peoples R China
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]Capital Med Univ, Xuanwu Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Changchun St 45th, Beijing, Peoples R China [2]China Int Neurosci Inst China INI, Spine Ctr, Beijing, Peoples R China [3]Capital Med Univ, Xuanwu Hosp, Lab Spinal Cord Injury & Funct Reconstruct, Beijing, Peoples R China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:16409 今日访问量:0 总访问量:869 更新日期:2025-01-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 首都医科大学宣武医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:北京市西城区长椿街45号宣武医院