机构:[1]Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester,MN[2]Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester,MN[3]Division of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester,MN[4]Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester,MN[5]Division of Cardiology, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, China心脏科(内科专业)首都医科大学宣武医院
Objective: To assess the effect of the metabolic syndrome (MetS) on endothelial function and compare these findings to those in individuals with a similar burden of traditional cardiovascular (CV) risk factors (>= 3) without MetS. Patients and Methods: Both MetS and multiple CV risk factors were identified from 1103 individuals who underwent the evaluation of endothelial function at the Mayo Clinic, in Rochester, Minnesota, from July 1, 2000, through July 31, 2011. Endothelial function was measured using digital arterial tonometry by assessing reactive hyperemia-induced vasodilation in one arm and adjusting for changes in the contralateral arm (reactive hyperemia index [RHI]). Results: A total of 316 individuals with MetS and 210 with multiple risk factors were assessed. Endothelial dysfunction was more pronounced in the MetS group compared with the multiple risk factor group (mean +/- SD natural logarithmic RHI, 0.61 +/- 0.25 and 0.68 +/- 0.28, respectively; P=.006). Leukocyte count (7.00 +/- 1.89 X 10(9)/L vs 6.41 +/- 1.76 X 10(9)/L, respectively; P=.001) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein level (1.78 +/- 1.53 mg/L vs 1.48 +/- 1.42 mg/L, respectively; P=.01) were higher in the MetS group compared with the multiple risk factor group. After adjustment for covariates and 6 traditional CV risk factors in a multivariate regression. model, MetS had a significant and independent influence on natural logarithmic RHI (beta=-.11; P=.01). Conclusion: The current study found that individuals with MetS have a higher degree of endothelial dysfunction and inflammation compared with individuals with multiple CV risk factors and may therefore have an increased CV risk beyond the contributions of multiple traditional risk factors. (C) 2012 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research square Mayo Clin Proc. 2012.87(10).968-975
基金:
National Institutes of Health (NIH) (grant HL-92954 and AG-31750and NIH grants DK-73608, HL-77131,and HL-085307)
the Chinam Scholarship Council (NO.2010811095)
the Beijing Nova Program of the Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission (A2007079)
the Walter and Gertrud Siegenthaler Foundation
the Young Academics Support Committee of the University of Zurich
the Swiss Foundation for Medical-Biological Scholarships (grant PASMP3_132551)
第一作者机构:[1]Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester,MN[5]Division of Cardiology, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
通讯作者:
通讯机构:[*1]Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Jing Li,Andreas J. Flammer,Ryan J. Lennon,et al.Comparison of the Effect of the Metabolic Syndrome and Multiple Traditional Cardiovascular Risk Factors on Vascular Function[J].MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS.2012,87(10):968-975.doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.07.004.
APA:
Jing Li,Andreas J. Flammer,Ryan J. Lennon,Rebecca E. Nelson,Rajiv Gulati...&Amir Lerman.(2012).Comparison of the Effect of the Metabolic Syndrome and Multiple Traditional Cardiovascular Risk Factors on Vascular Function.MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS,87,(10)
MLA:
Jing Li,et al."Comparison of the Effect of the Metabolic Syndrome and Multiple Traditional Cardiovascular Risk Factors on Vascular Function".MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS 87..10(2012):968-975