当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Neuroanesthesia and outcomes: evidence, opinions, and speculations on clinically relevant topics.

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [a]Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, [b]Department of Anesthesiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China [c]Department of Anesthesiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: evidence neuroanesthesia outcomes topics

摘要:
The objective of this review is to identify outstanding topics most relevant to neuroanesthesia practice and patient outcomes. We discuss the role of awake craniotomy, choice of general anesthetic agents, monitoring of anesthetic 'depth', mannitol-induced diuresis, neurophysiological monitoring, hyperventilation, and cerebral hypoperfusion. Awake craniotomy, although a technique likely underused, is associated with enhanced recovery after surgery and prolonged survival after brain tumor resection compared with surgery under general anesthesia. The choice of general anesthetic must balance patient and surgical factors. Although propofol may be associated with favorable oncologic outcomes, currently available retrospective evidence does not specifically address neurosurgical patients. Both the definition and monitoring of anesthetic 'depth' remains elusive. Neuroanesthesiologists need to recognize and manage intraoperative light anesthesia in a timely fashion. Further evidence related to the optimal management of mannitol-induced diuresis and hyperventilation in neurosurgical patients is needed. Contemporary neurophysiological monitoring can reasonably detect intraoperative neurologic injury; however, its effect on patient outcome is unclear. Finally, cerebral hypoperfusion without stroke may be common; however, the clinical significance requires further investigation. We provide an overview of several topics that are relevant to neuroanesthesia practice and patient outcomes based on evidence, opinions, and speculations. Our review highlights the need for further outcome-oriented studies to specifically address these clinically relevant issues.

语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2018]版
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 麻醉学
最新[2023]版
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 麻醉学
JCR分区:
出版当年[2017]版:
Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
最新[2023]版:
Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2017版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2016版] 出版后一年[2018版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [a]Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada,
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [*1]Department of Anesthesiology, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, TMP 3, PO Box 208051, New Haven, CT 06520, USA. [c]Department of Anesthesiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:16461 今日访问量:0 总访问量:871 更新日期:2025-01-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 首都医科大学宣武医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:北京市西城区长椿街45号宣武医院