当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Efficacy of Folic Acid Therapy in Primary Prevention of Stroke Among Adults With Hypertension in China The CSPPT Randomized Clinical Trial

文献详情

资源类型:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]Peking Univ, Hosp 1, Dept Cardiol, Beijing 100034, Peoples R China; [2]Southern Med Univ, Natl Clin Res Ctr Kidney Dis, State Key Lab Organ Failure Res, Renal Div,Nanfang Hosp, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China; [3]Anhui Med Univ, Inst Biomed, Hefei, Peoples R China; [4]Peking Univ, Hosp 1, Dept Neurol, Beijing 100034, Peoples R China; [5]Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Populat Family & Reprod Hlth, Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Baltimore, MD USA; [6]Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Neurol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA; [7]Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Epidemiol, Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Baltimore, MD USA; [8]Anhui Med Univ, Sch Hlth Adm, Hefei, Peoples R China; [9]Peking Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Sch Publ Hlth, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China; [10]First Peoples Hosp, Dept Neurol, Lianyungang, Peoples R China; [11]Anhui Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Neurol, Hefei, Peoples R China; [12]Guangdong Prov Hosp Chinese Med, Dept Neurol, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China; [13]Peking Univ, Hosp 1, Dept Pharm, Beijing 100034, Peoples R China; [14]Peking Univ, Hosp 1, Dept Cardiol, Beijing 100034, Peoples R China; [15]Peoples Liberat Army, Gen Hosp, Dept Geriatr Cardiol, Beijing, Peoples R China; [16]Nanchang Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Cardiol, Nanchang, Peoples R China; [17]Zhejiang Univ, Sch Med, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Cardiol, Hangzhou 310003, Zhejiang, Peoples R China; [18]Capital Med Univ, Beijing Chaoyang Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Beijing, Peoples R China; [19]Cent S Univ, Dept Cardiol, Xiangya Hosp, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China; [20]Shanxi Med Univ, Hosp 1, Dept Cardiol, Taiyuan, Peoples R China; [21]Fourth Mil Med Univ, Dept Neurol, Xijing Hosp, Xian 710032, Peoples R China; [22]Fudan Univ, Huashan Hosp, Dept Neurol, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China; [23]Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, State Key Lab Med Genom, Shanghai Key Lab Hypertens, Ruijin Hosp, Shanghai 200030, Peoples R China; [24]Peking Univ, Dept Physiol & Pathophysiol, Sch Basic Med Sci, Beijing 100034, Peoples R China; [25]Fudan Univ, Zhongshan Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Shanghai Inst Cardiovasc Dis, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China; [26]Fourth Mil Med Univ, Dept Cardiol, Tangdu Hosp, Xian 710032, Peoples R China; [27]Fu Wai Hosp, Div Hypertens, Beijing, Peoples R China; [28]Beijing Hypertens League Inst, Beijing, Peoples R China; [29]Peking Univ, Hosp 1, Dept Cardiol, 8 Xishiku St, Beijing 100034, Peoples R China
出处:
ISSN:

摘要:
IMPORTANCE Uncertainty remains about the efficacy of folic acid therapy for the primary prevention of stroke because of limited and inconsistent data. OBJECTIVE To test the primary hypothesis that therapy with enalapril and folic acid is more effective in reducing first stroke than enalapril alone among Chinese adults with hypertension. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The China Stroke Primary Prevention Trial, a randomized, double-blind clinical trial conducted from May 19, 2008, to August 24, 2013, in 32 communities in Jiangsu and Anhui provinces in China. A total of 20 702 adults with hypertension without history of stroke or myocardial infarction (MI) participated in the study. INTERVENTIONS Eligible participants, stratified by MTHFR C677T genotypes (CC, CT, and TT), were randomly assigned to receive double-blind daily treatment with a single-pill combination containing enalapril, 10 mg, and folic acid, 0.8 mg (n = 10 348) or a tablet containing enalapril,10 mg, alone (n = 10 354). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was first stroke. Secondary outcomes included first ischemic stroke; first hemorrhagic stroke; MI; a composite of cardiovascular events consisting of cardiovascular death, MI, and stroke; and all-cause death. RESULTS During a median treatment duration of 4.5 years, compared with the enalapril alone group, the enalapril-folic acid group had a significant risk reduction in first stroke (2.7% of participants in the enalapril-folic acid group vs 3.4% in the enalapril alone group; hazard ratio [HR], 0.79; 95% Cl, 0.68-0.93), first ischemic stroke (2.2% with enalapril-folic acid vs 2.8% with enalapril alone; HR, 0.76; 95% Cl, 0.64-0.91), and composite cardiovascular events consisting of cardiovascular death, MI, and stroke (3.1% with enalapril-folic acid vs 3.9% with enalapril alone; HR, 0.80; 95% Cl, 0.69-0.92). The risks of hemorrhagic stroke (HR, 0.93; 95% Cl, 0.65-1.34), MI (HR, 1.04; 95% Cl, 0.60-1.82), and all-cause deaths (HR, 0.94; 95% Cl, 0.81-1.10) did not differ significantly between the 2 treatment groups. There were no significant differences between the 2 treatment groups in the frequencies of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among adults with hypertension in China without a history of stroke or MI, the combined use of enalapril and folic acid, compared with enalapril alone, significantly reduced the risk of first stroke. These findings are consistent with benefits from folate use among adults with hypertension and low baseline folate levels.

基金:
语种:
高被引:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2014]版:
大类 | 1 区 医学
小类 | 1 区 医学:内科
最新[2023]版:
大类 | 1 区 医学
小类 | 1 区 医学:内科
JCR分区:
出版当年[2013]版:
Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
最新[2023]版:
Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2013版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2012版] 出版后一年[2014版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Peking Univ, Hosp 1, Dept Cardiol, Beijing 100034, Peoples R China;
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]Peking Univ, Hosp 1, Dept Cardiol, Beijing 100034, Peoples R China; [29]Peking Univ, Hosp 1, Dept Cardiol, 8 Xishiku St, Beijing 100034, Peoples R China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:16409 今日访问量:0 总访问量:869 更新日期:2025-01-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 首都医科大学宣武医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:北京市西城区长椿街45号宣武医院