机构:[1]Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, Beijing Neurosurgical Institute and Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China,重点科室医技科室研究所放射科放射科北京市神经外科研究所首都医科大学附属天坛医院[2]Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
Background: We conducted a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) study and compared the treatment of medium-sized intracranial aneurysms with LVIS and Enterprise stent-assisted coil embolization (SACE) to determine the effects of hemodynamic changes caused by different stent and coil packing densities (PDs) in endovascular treatment. Methods: We enrolled 87 consecutive patients, with 87 medium-sized intracranial aneurysms (>= 7, <= 12 mm), who underwent LVIS or Enterprise SACE. Aneurysms treated with LVIS SACE were allocated to the LVIS group, and the remainder were allocated to the Enterprise group. CFD were performed to assess hemodynamic alterations between before treatment, after stent deployment, and after SACE. Results: One aneurysm recanalized in the LVIS group (n = 42), and five recanalized in the Enterprise group (n = 45) (recanalization rate: 2.4 vs. 11.1%, respectively; P = 0.108). Higher complete obliteration rate (P = 0.069) was found in the LVIS group. Velocity at the neck plane showed a greater reduction ratio than velocity and WSS of the aneurysm in both groups after stent deployment, while velocity and WSS of the aneurysm showed a greater reduction ratio after coil placement. Further, there was a greater reduction in velocity at the neck plane (59.52 vs. 39.81%), aneurysmal velocity (88.46 vs. 69.45%), and wall shear stress (VVSS) (85.45 vs. 69.49%) on the aneurysm in the LVIS group (P < 0.001 for all). Specifically, the reduction ratio of velocity at the neck plane showed significant difference between the groups in the multivariate analysis (P = 0.013). Conclusions : LVIS SACE showed a lower recanalization for endovascular treatment of medium-sized intracranial aneurysms, and the greater hemodynamic alterations might be the key factors.
基金:
National Key Research and Development Plan of China [2016YFC1300800]; National Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China [81801156, 81801158, 81471167, 81671139]; Special Research Project for Capital Health Development [2018-4-1077]; Innovation Fund of Nanchang University for Graduate Students [cx2016312]
第一作者机构:[1]Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, Beijing Neurosurgical Institute and Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China,
通讯作者:
通讯机构:[1]Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, Beijing Neurosurgical Institute and Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China,
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Wenqiang Li,Yang Wang,Yisen Zhang,et al.Efficacy of LVIS vs. Enterprise Stent for Endovascular Treatment of Medium-Sized Intracranial Aneurysms: A Hemodynamic Comparison Study[J].FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY.2019,10(MAY):-.doi:10.3389/fneur.2019.00522.
APA:
Wenqiang Li,Yang Wang,Yisen Zhang,Kun Wang,Ying Zhang...&Jian Liu.(2019).Efficacy of LVIS vs. Enterprise Stent for Endovascular Treatment of Medium-Sized Intracranial Aneurysms: A Hemodynamic Comparison Study.FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY,10,(MAY)
MLA:
Wenqiang Li,et al."Efficacy of LVIS vs. Enterprise Stent for Endovascular Treatment of Medium-Sized Intracranial Aneurysms: A Hemodynamic Comparison Study".FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY 10..MAY(2019):-