当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Safety and efficacy of compound edaravone versus edaravone for patients with acute ischaemic stroke: A phase II, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, multiple-dose, active-controlled clinical trial

文献详情

资源类型:
机构: [1]Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China [2]China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China [3]Department of Neurology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China [4]Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China [5]Department of Neurology, General Hospital, PLA Shenyang Military Region, Shenyang, China [6]Department of Neurology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: compound edaravone edaravone ischemic stroke neuroprotection

摘要:
Background: Compound edaravone is a novel neuroprotective agent that comprised edaravone and (+)-borneol, a food additive with an anti-inflammatory effect in animal ischaemic stroke models. This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of compound edaravone compared with edaravone in treating patients with acute ischaemic stroke (AIS). Methods: In this multicentre, randomised, double-blind, multiple-dose, active-controlled, phase II clinical trial, patients with AIS within 48 hours after stroke onset were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) to low-dose (12.5 mg), medium-dose (37.5 mg) or high-dose (62.5 mg) compound edaravone groups, and an active control group with edaravone (30 mg) by 30 min intravenous infusion every 12 hours, for 14 consecutive days. The primary efficacy outcome was the proportion of modified Rankin Scale (mRS)score ≤1 at 90 days and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score change from baseline to 14 days after randomisation. The safety outcome included any adverse event during 90 days after treatment. Results: Of 385 patients included in the efficacy analysis, 94 were randomised to low-dose group, 97 to medium-dose group, 98 to high-dose group and 96 to the control group. No significant difference was observed among the four groups on mRS score (mRS ≤1, p=0.4054) at 90 days or NIHSS score change at 14 days (p=0.6799). However, a numerically higher percentage of patients with mRSscore ≤1 at 90 days in the medium-dose (69.39%) and high-dose (65.63%) groups was observed than in the control group (60.64%). No significant difference in severe adverse events was found among the four groups (p=0.3815). Conclusions: Compared with edaravone alone, compound edaravone was safe and well tolerated at all doses, although no significant improvement in functional outcomes was observed at 90days. Trial registration number: NCT01929096. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

语种:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2018]版:
最新[2023]版:
大类 | 1 区 医学
小类 | 2 区 临床神经病学
第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China [2]China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China [2]China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:16409 今日访问量:0 总访问量:869 更新日期:2025-01-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 首都医科大学宣武医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:北京市西城区长椿街45号宣武医院