当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Low dose concomitant treatment with chlorpromazine and promethazine is safe in acute ischemic stroke.

文献详情

资源类型:
机构: [1]Department of Neurology, Beijing Luhe Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China [2]China-America Institute of Neuroscience, Beijing Luhe Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China [3]Department of Neurosurgery, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA [4]John D. Dingell VA Medical Center, Detroit, MI, USA
出处:
ISSN:

摘要:
Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality and has a very narrow window of treatment with fibrinolytics. We investigated the safety and efficacy of combined chlorpromazine and promethazine (C+P) treatment in AIS. A total of 64 consecutive patients diagnosed with AIS were selected and were randomly (double-blind) assigned into either the control group (standard of care [SOC] treatment) or the treatment group (SOC+C+P [12.5+12.5 mg BID or 25+25 mg BID]) which were treated for 2 weeks. The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) were computed prior to and after treatment to evaluate neurological deficits and daily functional status. In our study, 64 patients (males=81.3%) were divided into either the control (34 patients, 83.3% males, mean age=58.8±11.7 years) or the study group (30 patients, 79.4% males, mean age=62.3±9.1 years). While the NIHSS scores were not different between the control and treatment group at admission (P>0.05), a greater proportion of the cohort in both the groups (control group low NIHSS=79.4%, high NIHSS=20.6%, P<0.01) had a lower NIHSS at admission and (treatment group low NIHSS=83.3%, high NIHSS=16.7%, P<0.01). Interestingly, while both the control and treatment group had lower NIHSS and mRS scores at 90d post treatment compared to those at baseline, there were no significant differences in those scores between the two group (P>0.05) suggesting no improved benefit with C+P. Moreover, using C+P did not lead to any serious adverse effects when compared to the treatment group. While the addition of low dose chlorpromazine and promethazine to standard of care for acute ischemic stroke did not have any significant improvement in functional outcomes, there were no serious adverse effects. Thus, the use of chlorpromazine and promethazine in the acute ischemic stroke setting and future studies using higher doses of C+P are justified.

语种:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2018]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 临床神经病学 4 区 外科
最新[2023]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 临床神经病学 4 区 外科
第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Department of Neurology, Beijing Luhe Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China [2]China-America Institute of Neuroscience, Beijing Luhe Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:16470 今日访问量:0 总访问量:871 更新日期:2025-01-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 首都医科大学宣武医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:北京市西城区长椿街45号宣武医院