Background: Mini gastric bypass has been proved to be capable of achieving excellent metabolic results by numerous published studies. Compared to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, mini gastric bypass is a technically simpler and reversible procedure. However, comparative outcomes of the effectiveness between Mini gastric bypass and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass remain unclear. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed in Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane library from inception to February 9, 2018. For assessment of method quality, NOS (Newcastle-Ottawa Scale) and Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias were used for cohort study and randomized controlled trials, respectively. The meta-analysis was performed by RevMan 5.3 software. Results: 10 cohort studies and 1 randomized controlled trial was included in our meta-analysis. The method quality of the 10 cohort studies was proved as high quality according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The randomized controlled trial was proved to have a low risk of bias according to Cochrane Collaboration's assessment. Patients receiving mini-gastric bypass had multiple advantageous indexes as compared with patients receiving Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Examples include: a higher 1-year EWL% (P < 0.05), higher 2-year EWL% (P < 0.05), higher type 2 diabetes mellitus remission rate, as well as a shorter operation time (P < 0.05). No significant statistical difference was observed in hypertension remission rate, mortality, leakage rate, GERD rate, or hospital stay between mini gastric bypass and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Conclusion: Mini gastric bypass seems to be a simpler procedure with a better weight reduction effect. This seems to also be the case regarding remission rates of type 2 diabetes mellitus when using Mini gastric bypass in comparison to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. A small sample size and biased data may have influenced the stability of our results. In light of this, surgeons should treat our results in a conservative way. Larger sample size and multi-center randomized control trials are needed to compare the effectiveness and safety between mini-gastric bypass and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.
第一作者机构:[a]Department of General Surgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China[b]Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China
通讯作者:
通讯机构:[a]Department of General Surgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China[*1]Department of General Surgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 6, Tiantanxili Road, Beijing 100050, China.
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Fu-Gang Wang,Wen-Mao Yan,Ming Yan,et al.Outcomes of Mini vs Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: A meta-analysis and systematic review[J].INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY.2018,56:7-14.doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.05.009.
APA:
Fu-Gang Wang,Wen-Mao Yan,Ming Yan&Mao-Min Song.(2018).Outcomes of Mini vs Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: A meta-analysis and systematic review.INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY,56,
MLA:
Fu-Gang Wang,et al."Outcomes of Mini vs Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: A meta-analysis and systematic review".INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY 56.(2018):7-14