当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Outcomes of Mini vs Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: A meta-analysis and systematic review

文献详情

资源类型:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [a]Department of General Surgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China [b]Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: Mini gastric bypass Omega gastric bypass Single anastomosis gastric bypass Obesity Roux-en-Y gastric bypass Bariatric surgery

摘要:
Background: Mini gastric bypass has been proved to be capable of achieving excellent metabolic results by numerous published studies. Compared to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, mini gastric bypass is a technically simpler and reversible procedure. However, comparative outcomes of the effectiveness between Mini gastric bypass and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass remain unclear. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed in Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane library from inception to February 9, 2018. For assessment of method quality, NOS (Newcastle-Ottawa Scale) and Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias were used for cohort study and randomized controlled trials, respectively. The meta-analysis was performed by RevMan 5.3 software. Results: 10 cohort studies and 1 randomized controlled trial was included in our meta-analysis. The method quality of the 10 cohort studies was proved as high quality according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The randomized controlled trial was proved to have a low risk of bias according to Cochrane Collaboration's assessment. Patients receiving mini-gastric bypass had multiple advantageous indexes as compared with patients receiving Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Examples include: a higher 1-year EWL% (P < 0.05), higher 2-year EWL% (P < 0.05), higher type 2 diabetes mellitus remission rate, as well as a shorter operation time (P < 0.05). No significant statistical difference was observed in hypertension remission rate, mortality, leakage rate, GERD rate, or hospital stay between mini gastric bypass and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Conclusion: Mini gastric bypass seems to be a simpler procedure with a better weight reduction effect. This seems to also be the case regarding remission rates of type 2 diabetes mellitus when using Mini gastric bypass in comparison to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. A small sample size and biased data may have influenced the stability of our results. In light of this, surgeons should treat our results in a conservative way. Larger sample size and multi-center randomized control trials are needed to compare the effectiveness and safety between mini-gastric bypass and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2017]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 外科
最新[2023]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 2 区 外科
JCR分区:
出版当年[2016]版:
Q2 SURGERY
最新[2023]版:
Q1 SURGERY

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2016版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2015版] 出版后一年[2017版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [a]Department of General Surgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China [b]Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [a]Department of General Surgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China [*1]Department of General Surgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 6, Tiantanxili Road, Beijing 100050, China.
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:16409 今日访问量:0 总访问量:869 更新日期:2025-01-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 首都医科大学宣武医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:北京市西城区长椿街45号宣武医院