当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Carotid endarterectomy for treatment of carotid in-stent restenosis: Longterm follow-up results and surgery experiences from one single centre

文献详情

资源类型:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [a]Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China [b]China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases (NCRCND), Beijing, China [c]Center of Stroke, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Beijing, China [d]Beijing Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine for Cerebrovascular Disease, Beijing, China [e]Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Mi Yun Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
出处:
ISSN:

摘要:
Objective: Few studies have reported the surgical treatment of carotid in-stent restenosis (ISR), more data and longer follow-up are needed. We describe the surgical treatment of ISR by standard carotid endarterectomy (CEA) with stent removal, including long-term follow-up in 10 patients from our centre. Methods: Ten patients from our centre who underwent CEA with stent removal for ISR were retrospectively analysed, including nine symptomatic and one asymptomatic ISR of at least 70% with mean age 67.3, the median time between carotid artery stenting and CEA was 17 months (range, 2-54 months). Results: Standard CEA with stent removal was performed in all 10 patients without much technical difficulty (9 male and 1 female, mean age 67.3). Two cases were performed in hybrid operation room. There were a total of three complications that happened in three patients (30%) respectively. An asymptomatic dissecting aneurysm was formed on the petrous internal carotid artery in one patient who was followed up without intervention. In the second case, dissection occurred in the arterial wall distal to the site of the stent after stent removal revealed by intraoperative angiography, and another stent was implanted. The patient sustained temporary hypoglossal nerve dysfunction postoperatively. The third patient suffered cerebral hyperperfusion with complete recovery when discharged. No neurological complications occurred in other seven patients. After follow-up of 25 months (range, 11-54 months), one patient died of rectal cancer without ischaemic attack and restenosis 4 years postoperation; in one patient occurred recurrent symptomatic restenosis (90%) 1 year later; all other patients remained asymptomatic and without recurrent restenosis (>50%) by follow-up carotid ultrasound or CT angiography. Conclusion: It seems that CEA with stent removal is a reasonable choice, by experienced hand, for symptomatic ISR with higher but acceptable complications. The indication of stent removal for asymptomatic ISR needs further observation. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved.

基金:
语种:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2016]版:
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 2 区 临床神经病学
JCR分区:
出版当年[2015]版:
最新[2023]版:
Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2015版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2014版]

第一作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:17286 今日访问量:0 总访问量:928 更新日期:2025-05-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 首都医科大学宣武医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:北京市西城区长椿街45号宣武医院