当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Efficacy of Pregabalin for Peripheral Neuropathic Pain: Results of an 8-Week, Flexible-Dose, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Conducted in China

文献详情

资源类型:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]Beijing Union Med Coll Hosp, Dept Neurol, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China; [2]Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Jiangsu Prov Peoples Hosp, Nanjing, Peoples R China; [3]Tianjin Med Univ, Gen Hosp, Tianjin, Peoples R China; [4]Peking Univ, Hosp 3, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China; [5]Qingdao Univ, Med Coll Hosp, Qingdao 266071, Peoples R China; [6]Beijing Tiantan Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China; [7]Shanghai Changzheng Hosp, Shanghai, Peoples R China; [8]Huashan Hosp, Shanghai, Peoples R China; [9]Sichuan Univ, W China Hosp, Chengdu 610064, Peoples R China; [10]Guangzhou First Municipal Peoples Hosp, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China; [11]Ruijin Hosp, Shanghai, Peoples R China; [12]Pfizer Global Res & Dev, New York, NY USA; [13]Pfizer Inc, Shanghai, Peoples R China; [14]Beijing Union Med Coll Hosp, Dept Neurol, 1Shuaifu Garden, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: diabetic peripheral neuropathy neuropathic pain postherpetic neuralgia pregabalin

摘要:
Background: Several classes of medications such as tricyclic antidepressants, anticonvulsants, narcotic analgesics, and alpha 2-delta ligands, such as pregabalin, have been reported to be efficacious in the treatment of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) and postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) in whites. However, no large double-blind, placebo-controlled trials have been reported that evaluated the efficacy of pregabalin for the treatment of neuropathic pain in a Chinese population in China. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of flexible-dose pregabalin in treatment of Chinese patients diagnosed with painful DPN or PHN. Methods: This was a double-blind, parallel-group study in which patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio and treated with either flexible-dose pregabalin, 150 to 600 mg/d, or corresponding flexible-dose placebo for 8 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was change in the mean pain score based on a daily pain rating scale (DPRS; ranging from 0 [no pain] to 10 [worst possible pain]). Secondary end points included Daily Sleep Interference scale, short form-McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) scale, and the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) and Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC) scales. Adverse events and physical and laboratory examination results were also collected. Results: Pregabalin and placebo treatment groups were well-matched in terms of demographic and patient characteristics. On the primary outcome, end point change in mean DPRS score, treatment with pregabalin (N = 206) resulted in significant improvement compared with results with placebo (N = 102), with a least squares mean difference score of -0.6 (P = 0.005). With regard to responder rates, 64% and 52% of patients treated with pregabalin and placebo, respectively, reported >= 30% improvement in DPRS scores (P = 0.04). Treatment with pregabalin also resulted in significant efficacy compared with that of placebo on secondary measures, including SF-MPQ VAS score (P = 0.012), SF-MPQ present pain intensity index score (P = 0.003), sleep interference score (P = 0.023), and PGIC and CGIC scores (P = 0.004 and P = 0.001, respectively). Adverse events were observed in 50.0% of pregabalin patients and 40.2% of placebo patients (P = 0.105), with the most common adverse event being dizziness (11.2%). Conclusions: Study results suggest that relative to placebo, pregabalin in daily doses of 150 to 600 mg/d was effective and well tolerated in Chinese patients diagnosed with moderate-to-severe DPN or PHN, indicated through improved pain scores and PGIC scores. (Clin Ther. 2011;33:159-166) (C) 2011 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc. All rights reserved.

基金:
语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2010]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 药学
最新[2023]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 药学
JCR分区:
出版当年[2009]版:
Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
最新[2023]版:
Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2009版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2008版] 出版后一年[2010版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Beijing Union Med Coll Hosp, Dept Neurol, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China; [2]Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Jiangsu Prov Peoples Hosp, Nanjing, Peoples R China; [3]Tianjin Med Univ, Gen Hosp, Tianjin, Peoples R China; [4]Peking Univ, Hosp 3, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China; [5]Qingdao Univ, Med Coll Hosp, Qingdao 266071, Peoples R China; [6]Beijing Tiantan Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China; [7]Shanghai Changzheng Hosp, Shanghai, Peoples R China; [8]Huashan Hosp, Shanghai, Peoples R China; [9]Sichuan Univ, W China Hosp, Chengdu 610064, Peoples R China; [10]Guangzhou First Municipal Peoples Hosp, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China; [11]Ruijin Hosp, Shanghai, Peoples R China; [12]Pfizer Global Res & Dev, New York, NY USA; [13]Pfizer Inc, Shanghai, Peoples R China; [14]Beijing Union Med Coll Hosp, Dept Neurol, 1Shuaifu Garden, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]Beijing Union Med Coll Hosp, Dept Neurol, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China; [14]Beijing Union Med Coll Hosp, Dept Neurol, 1Shuaifu Garden, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:16409 今日访问量:0 总访问量:869 更新日期:2025-01-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 首都医科大学宣武医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:北京市西城区长椿街45号宣武医院