机构:[1]Capital Univ Med Sci, Dept Neurol & Intervent Neuroradiol, Beijing Tiantan Hosp, Beijing 100050, Peoples R China;重点科室诊疗科室医技科室神经病学中心放射科神经病学中心放射科首都医科大学附属天坛医院[2]Capital Univ Med Sci, Dept Neurol, Beijing Tiantan Hosp, Beijing 100050, Peoples R China;重点科室诊疗科室神经病学中心神经病学中心首都医科大学附属天坛医院[3]Capital Univ Med Sci, Neurovasc Angioplasty Team, Beijing Tiantan Hosp, Beijing 100050, Peoples R China;首都医科大学附属天坛医院[4]Capital Univ Med Sci, Dept Neurol & Intervent Neuroradiol, Beijing Tiantan Hosp, 6 Tiantan Xili, Beijing 100050, Peoples R China重点科室诊疗科室医技科室神经病学中心放射科神经病学中心放射科首都医科大学附属天坛医院
出处:
ISSN:
摘要:
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A recent trial shows an 8.3 per 100-patient-years' ischemic stroke rate in the territory of the intracranial stenotic artery, despite aspirin treatment. Our aim was to prospectively study the feasibility and outcome of a new intracranial balloon-expandable Apollo stent for symptomatic atherosclerotic intracranial stenosis (SAIS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-six patients (41 men and 5 women; median, 54 years of age) with forty-eight >= 50% SAISs were enrolled. Procedural feasibility was evaluated by stent success (residual stenosis <= 30%) and procedural time. The primary end point was ischemic stroke in the target-lesion artery territory, including any stroke and death within 30 days. RESULTS: Forty-four lesions (91.7%) obtained stent success within a median procedural time of 50.6 minutes. Severe tortuosity correlated with stent failure. Three patients (6.5%, 3/46) had minor strokes within 30 days. All patients were available for follow-up (46 had 30-day follow-up, 45 had 6-month follow-up, 44 had 12- and 18-month follow-up, and 24 had follow-up of >= 24 months), which varied from 1 month to 30.7 months (median, 23.9 months). After 30 days, 1 patient (2.2%, 1/46) developed minor stroke in the target-lesion artery territory at 6.7 months. Primary end point rate was 4.3 per 100 patient years. Angiographic follow-up was performed in 25 patients. Seven restenoses (28%, 7/25) were detected, 1 of which was symptomatic. CONCLUSION: Angioplasty with the Apollo stent for symptomatic atherosclerotic intracranial stenosis is feasible. Severe tortuosity is an independent predictor of stent failure. Our clinical outcome seems to compare favorably with results of aspirin therapy, but the restenotic rate was high.
语种:
外文
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2006]版:
大类|3 区医学
最新[2023]版:
大类|3 区医学
小类|3 区临床神经病学3 区神经成像3 区核医学
JCR分区:
出版当年[2005]版:
Q1RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGINGQ2NEUROIMAGINGQ2CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
最新[2023]版:
Q1RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGINGQ2CLINICAL NEUROLOGYQ2NEUROIMAGING
第一作者机构:[1]Capital Univ Med Sci, Dept Neurol & Intervent Neuroradiol, Beijing Tiantan Hosp, Beijing 100050, Peoples R China;[2]Capital Univ Med Sci, Dept Neurol, Beijing Tiantan Hosp, Beijing 100050, Peoples R China;[3]Capital Univ Med Sci, Neurovasc Angioplasty Team, Beijing Tiantan Hosp, Beijing 100050, Peoples R China;[4]Capital Univ Med Sci, Dept Neurol & Intervent Neuroradiol, Beijing Tiantan Hosp, 6 Tiantan Xili, Beijing 100050, Peoples R China
通讯作者:
通讯机构:[1]Capital Univ Med Sci, Dept Neurol & Intervent Neuroradiol, Beijing Tiantan Hosp, Beijing 100050, Peoples R China;[2]Capital Univ Med Sci, Dept Neurol, Beijing Tiantan Hosp, Beijing 100050, Peoples R China;[3]Capital Univ Med Sci, Neurovasc Angioplasty Team, Beijing Tiantan Hosp, Beijing 100050, Peoples R China;[4]Capital Univ Med Sci, Dept Neurol & Intervent Neuroradiol, Beijing Tiantan Hosp, 6 Tiantan Xili, Beijing 100050, Peoples R China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Jiang W.-J.,Xu X.-T.,Jin M.,et al.Apollo stent for symptomatic atherosclerotic intracranial stenosis: Study results[J].AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY.2007,28(5):830-834.
APA:
Jiang, W.-J.,Xu, X.-T.,Jin, M.,Du, B.,Dong, K.-H.&Dai, J.-P..(2007).Apollo stent for symptomatic atherosclerotic intracranial stenosis: Study results.AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY,28,(5)
MLA:
Jiang, W.-J.,et al."Apollo stent for symptomatic atherosclerotic intracranial stenosis: Study results".AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY 28..5(2007):830-834