当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

High volume practice proved the safety of off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in left main coronary artery lesions: a two-year single center experience

文献详情

资源类型:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE ◇ 统计源期刊 ◇ CSCD-C ◇ 中华系列

机构: [1]Capital Med Univ, Dept Cardiac Surg, Beijing Anzhen Hosp, Beijing Inst Heart Lung & Blood Vessel Dis, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China; [2]Capital Med Univ, Dept Cardiol, Beijing Anzhen Hosp, Beijing Inst Heart Lung & Blood Vessel Dis, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China; [3]Capital Med Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Beijing Anzhen Hosp, Beijing Inst Heart Lung & Blood Vessel Dis, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: coronary artery disease coronary artery bypass grafting left main coronary artery

摘要:
Background Left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenosis has been recognized as a risk factor for early death among patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). This study aimed to assess if LMCA lesions pose an additional risk of early or mid-term mortality and/or a major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (MACCE) after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG), compared with non-left main coronary artery stenosis (non-mainstem disease). Methods From January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2010, 4869 patients had a primary isolated OPCABG procedure at Beijing Anzhen Hospital. According to the pathology of LMCA lesions, they were retrospectively classified as a non-mainstem disease group (n=3933) or a LMCA group (n=936). Propensity scores were used to match the two groups, patients from the non-mainstem disease group (n=831) were also randomly selected to match patients from the LMCA group (n=831). Freedom from MACCE in the two groups was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results The difference in the mortality and the rate of MACCE during the first 30 days between the non-mainstem disease group and the LMCA group did not reach statistical significance (P=0.429, P=0.127 respectively). With a mean follow-up of (12.8 +/- 7.5) months and a cumulative follow-up of 1769.6 patient-years, the difference in the freedom from MACCEs between the two groups, calculated through Kaplan-Meier method, did not reach statistical significance (P=0.831). Conclusion Analysis of a high volume of OPCABG procedures proved that LMCA lesions do not pose additional early and mid-term risk to OPCABG. Therefore, a LMCA lesion is as safe as non-mainstem disease lesion during the OPCABG procedure. 5 Chin Med J 2012;125(21):3861-3867

基金:
语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2011]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 医学:内科
最新[2023]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 医学:内科
JCR分区:
出版当年[2010]版:
Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
最新[2023]版:
Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2010版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2009版] 出版后一年[2011版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [2]Capital Med Univ, Dept Cardiol, Beijing Anzhen Hosp, Beijing Inst Heart Lung & Blood Vessel Dis, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China;
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]Capital Med Univ, Dept Cardiac Surg, Beijing Anzhen Hosp, Beijing Inst Heart Lung & Blood Vessel Dis, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China;
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

相关文献

[1]Impact of diabetes mellitus on patients with unprotected left main coronary artery lesion disease treated with either percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary-artery bypass grafting [2]Drug-Eluting Stent Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Diabetic Patients With Multivessel and/or Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis [3]Very Long-term Outcomes and Predictors of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Drug-eluting Stents Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Patients with Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease [4]Very Long-term Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Drug-eluting Stents versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Patients with Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease [5]Impact of chronic kidney disease on patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease treated with coronary artery bypass grafting or drug-eluting stents [6]Infuence of diabetes mellitus on long-term outcomes of patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease treated with either drug-eluting stents or coronary artery bypass grafting [7]Long term outcomes of drug-eluting stent versus coronary artery bypass grafting for left main coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis [8]Percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent versus coronary artery bypass grafting for diabetic patients with multivessel and/or left main disease: a meta-analysis [9]Transradial Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Unprotected Left Main and/or Multivessel Disease in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome [10]Comparison of Transradial Coronary Intervention versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Unprotected Left Main Disease in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome

资源点击量:16409 今日访问量:0 总访问量:869 更新日期:2025-01-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 首都医科大学宣武医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:北京市西城区长椿街45号宣武医院