当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Postoperative adjuvant therapy following radical resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A multicenter retrospective study.

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]Department of Radiation Oncology, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China. [2]Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China. [3]Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China. [4]Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Southwest Hospital Affiliated to the Army Medical University, Chongqing, China. [5]Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China. [6]Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Tongji Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China. [7]Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. [8]Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. [9]Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Renji Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China. [10]Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Xuanwu Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. [11]Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Chuanbei Medical University, Nanchong, China. [12]Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Tiantan Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. [13]Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery Ⅲ, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Secondary Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: adjuvant therapy disease-free survival intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma overall survival propensity score matching

摘要:
The prognosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) after radical resection is far from satisfactory; however, the clinical value of adjuvant therapy (AT) remains controversial. This multicenter study aimed to evaluate the clinical value of AT and identify potential patients who would be benefited from AT. Data from ICC patients who underwent radical resection were retrospectively collected from 12 hepatobiliary centers in China between December 2012 and December 2015. Patients were divided into AT and non-AT groups based on whether AT was administered or not. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method before and after 1:2 propensity score matching (PSM). Subgroup analyses were conducted based on the established staging systems. A total of 412 patients were enrolled in this study, and 77 patients (18.9%) received AT, including 32 (7.8%) patients who received transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), 21 (5.1%) patients who received chemotherapy, 10 (2.4%) patients who received radiotherapy, and 14 (3.4%) patients who received adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The median OS and DFS were both longer in the AT group than in the non-AT group (43.0 months vs 21.0 months, P = .015; 16.0 months vs 11.0 months, P = .045, respectively), and the advantage of AT was confirmed for both the OS and DFS (P = .023; P = .046, respectively) after 1:2 PSM. Furthermore, based on the established nomogram, only "middle-risk" patients receiving AT cherished a longer median OS (43.0 months vs 20.0 months, P = .033). In subgroup analyses that were stratified by different AT strategies, patients receiving postoperative chemotherapy had a longer median OS (37.0 months vs 21.0 months, P = .039), while patients receiving postoperative TACE had a longer median DFS (50.0 months vs 11.0 months, P = .007). With the current data, we conclude that AT benefits ICC patients following radical resection, especially those "middle-risk" patients, as evaluated by the established nomogram. However, exactly which patients are the most suitable for AT requires further study and validation. © 2020 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

基金:

基金编号: 2018QH1195

语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2019]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 肿瘤学
最新[2023]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 肿瘤学
JCR分区:
出版当年[2018]版:
Q2 ONCOLOGY
最新[2023]版:
Q2 ONCOLOGY

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2018版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2017版] 出版后一年[2019版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Department of Radiation Oncology, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:16409 今日访问量:0 总访问量:869 更新日期:2025-01-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 首都医科大学宣武医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:北京市西城区长椿街45号宣武医院