当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Efficacy and safety of thromboprophylaxis in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]Department of Critical Care Medicine, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China [2]Department of Anesthesiology, Capital Medical University Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing, China [3]Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center of China, Tianjin, China [4]Department of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital Sun Yatsen University, Guangzhou, China [5]Department of Critical Care Medicine, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: cancer major bleeding thromboprophylaxis venous thromboembolism

摘要:
Background: Thrombosis is a common complication in patients with cancer. Whether thromboprophylaxis could benefit patients with cancer is unclear. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the efficacy and safety of thromboprophylaxis in patients with cancer undergoing surgery or chemotherapy. Methods: We searched the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, EBSCOhost, and Web of Science for studies published before May 2018 to investigate whether thromboprophylaxis measures were more effective than a placebo in patients with cancer. Results: In total, 33 trials with 11,942 patients with cancer were identified. In patients with cancer undergoing surgery, the administration of thromboprophylaxis was associated with decreasing trends in venous thromboembolism (VTE) [relative risk (RR) 0.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.32-0.81] and DVT (RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.33-0.87). In patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy, the administration of thromboprophylaxis reduced the incidences of VTE, DVT, and pulmonary embolism compared with no thromboprophylaxis (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.40-0.73; RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.31-0.73; RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.32-0.81, respectively). The pooled results regarding major bleeding showed no significant difference between prophylaxis and no prophylaxis in either the surgical or the chemotherapy groups (RR 2.35, 95% CI 0.74-7.52, p = 0.1482, I-2 = 0%; RR 1.30, 95% CI 0.93-1.83, p = 0.1274, I-2 = 0%, respectively). Conclusion: Thromboprophylaxis did not increase major bleeding events or the incidence of thrombocytopenia. All-cause mortality was not significantly different between those who received thromboprophylaxis and those who did not. This meta-analysis provides evidence that thromboprophylaxis can reduce the number of VTE and DVT events, with no apparent increase in the incidence of major bleeding in patients with cancer.

基金:
语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2019]版
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 2 区 肿瘤学
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 肿瘤学
JCR分区:
出版当年[2018]版:
Q1 ONCOLOGY
最新[2023]版:
Q2 ONCOLOGY

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2018版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2017版] 出版后一年[2019版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Department of Critical Care Medicine, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China [2]Department of Anesthesiology, Capital Medical University Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing, China
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [*1]Department of Critical Care Medicine, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China [*2]Department of Critical Care Medicine, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, No. 150 Haping Rd., Nangang District, Harbin, 150081, China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:16996 今日访问量:0 总访问量:905 更新日期:2025-04-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 首都医科大学宣武医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:北京市西城区长椿街45号宣武医院