当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Correlation between intracranial vertebral artery stenosis diameter measured by digital subtraction angiography and cross-sectional area measured by optical coherence tomography.

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]Department of Neurosurgery,Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China [2]China International Neuroscience Institute (ChinaINI), Beijing, China [3]Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
出处:
ISSN:

摘要:
Intracranial vertebral artery (V4 segment) stenosis quantification traditionally uses the narrowest stenosis diameter. However, the stenotic V4 lumen is commonly irregularly shaped. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) allows a more precise calculation of V4 geometry. We compared the narrowest diameter stenosis (DS), measured by digital subtraction angiography (DSA), with the area stenosis (AS), measured by OCT. We hypothesized that DS is the gold standard for measuring the degree of stenosis. Five neuroradiologists evaluated 49 stenosed V4 segments in a blinded protocol. V4 stenosis was measured in millimeters on DSA at its narrowest diameter. OCT was used to estimate the cross-sectional luminal area. We also used automated software to measure DS. Three different angles (anterior, lateral, and oblique views) were used for calculations, and the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) and Warfarin-Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial Disease (WASID) methods were used in all measurements. Spearman's R values were calculated. Non-linear regression analysis was performed between the DS and AS, with statistically different correlations. A high correlation was observed between the WASID and NASCET methods to measure DS with observer measurement and automated software. A good correlation was found between DS measured by observers and AS measured by OCT. Non-linear regression analysis showed that only observer measurement using the oblique view and the WASID method could attain statistically significant differences, but it was weak (r=0.389). Measurement of the narrowest diameter was not a reliable predictor of the cross-sectional area of V4 stenosis. Larger studies are therefore needed to develop a new evaluation system based on V4 stenosis. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

基金:
语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2020]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 2 区 外科 3 区 神经成像
最新[2023]版:
大类 | 1 区 医学
小类 | 1 区 神经成像 1 区 外科
JCR分区:
出版当年[2019]版:
Q1 SURGERY Q1 NEUROIMAGING
最新[2023]版:
Q1 NEUROIMAGING Q1 SURGERY

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2019版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2018版] 出版后一年[2020版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Department of Neurosurgery,Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China [2]China International Neuroscience Institute (ChinaINI), Beijing, China
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]Department of Neurosurgery,Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China [*1]Department of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing 100053, China [2]China International Neuroscience Institute (ChinaINI), Beijing, China [3]Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:16409 今日访问量:0 总访问量:869 更新日期:2025-01-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 首都医科大学宣武医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:北京市西城区长椿街45号宣武医院