当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Pain-Free Survival After Endoscopic Rhizotomy Versus Radiofrequency for Lumbar Facet Joint Pain: A Real-World Comparison Study.

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]Beijing Institute of Functional Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: Low back pain facet joint medial branch endoscopic rhizotomy radiofrequency pain-free survival real-world study

摘要:
Endoscopic rhizotomy (ER) of the medial branch has been recently developed for the treatment of lumbar facet joint pain (LFJP). However, there are no studies comparing the pain-free duration after ER and radiofrequency (RF).To evaluate the long-term outcomes for pain and physical function in patients who underwent ER versus RF for LFJP and compare their pain-free survival.Open label, prospective, real-world study that includes patients treated with ER or RF at a single center between November 2017 and February 2020.The research took place within a single university-based neuro-spine center.Patients with a positive diagnostic medial branch block (>= 80% pain relief) were treated with ER or RF. Numeric rating scale (NRS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Global Impression of Change (GIoC) were obtained at the baseline, and at 6 months and 12 months postoperatively. The duration of pain-free time was recorded at every follow-up. The final follow-up was conducted in March 2021.Of 55 patients with LFJP, 19 underwent ER, and 36 underwent RF. Both ER and RF groups showed significant decreases in NRS and ODI scores at 6 months and 12 months compared with baseline (P < 0.001). ER had significantly better efficacy than RF in NRS, ODI, and GIoC scores at 6 and 12 months (P < 0.05). The pain-free survival curves showed that the median pain-free duration was 20 months and 10 months in ER and RF, respectively.Patients were not randomized to different groups, which may have led to bias.Both ER and RF can improve the pain and physical function in patients with LFJP. ER is associated with a longer operative duration and medical expenses; however, it provides more sustained efficacy than RF. The surgical choice should depend on the patients' specific conditions.

语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2021]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 麻醉学 3 区 临床神经病学
最新[2023]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 麻醉学 3 区 临床神经病学
JCR分区:
出版当年[2020]版:
Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
最新[2023]版:
Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2020版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2019版] 出版后一年[2021版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Beijing Institute of Functional Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]Beijing Institute of Functional Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing, China [*1]Beijing Institute of Functional Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University45 Changchun St, Xicheng District, Beijing 100053, China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:16461 今日访问量:0 总访问量:871 更新日期:2025-01-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 首都医科大学宣武医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:北京市西城区长椿街45号宣武医院