当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Carotid Stenting Versus Endarterectomy for Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]China International Neuroscience Institute (China-INI), Peoples Republic of China [2]Department of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, Peoples Republic of China [3]Neuroendovascular Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston [4]Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Peoples Republic of China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: carotid artery carotid stenosis endarterectomy carotid myocardial infarction stent

摘要:
To compare safety and efficacy between carotid artery stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in treating asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis based on results from randomized controlled trials.Randomized controlled trials comparing CAS and CEA in treating asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis were searched from databases of the EMBASE, PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane libraries. Two independent reviewers identified eligible studies, extracted relevant data, and used the Cochrane risk of bias tool to assess quality. Mantel-Haenszel method random-effects models were used to estimate odds ratio (OR) regarding perioperative risks between CAS and CEA. Kaplan-Meier curve data were extracted and analyzed through Exp[(O-E)/Var] fixed-effect models to calculate the Peto odds ratio (OR) regarding long-term outcomes.Sixteen articles from 7 randomized controlled trials were included, reporting relevant outcomes for 7230 asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis patients (CAS: n=3920; CEA: n=3198). Compared with the CEA group, CAS group had no difference in perioperative composite end point events including stroke, death, and myocardial infarction (MI; OR, 1.13 [95% CI, 0.87-1.47]; P=0.37, I2=0%). Compared with CEA, CAS had a higher risk of any stroke during the perioperative period (OR, 1.62 [95% CI, 1.16-2.24]; P=0.004, I2=0%) and an increased risk of nondisabling stroke (OR, 1.81 [95% CI, 1.23-2.65]; P=0.003, I2=0%), but there was no significant difference in disabling stroke and death between groups (OR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.50-1.65]; P=0.76, I2=0%). For long-term outcomes, no difference regarding the composite outcome of any stroke, death, and myocardial infarction existed between CEA and CAS (Peto OR, 1.18 [95% CI, 0.94-1.48]; P=0.14, I2=0%). Individual-level patient data would be important to verify the long-term outcome results.When treating asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis, CAS has comparable perioperative and long-term composite outcomes compared with CEA. However, CAS may have a higher risk of any stroke and nondisabling stroke in the perioperative period.

语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2021]版:
大类 | 1 区 医学
小类 | 1 区 临床神经病学 1 区 外周血管病
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 1 区 医学
小类 | 1 区 临床神经病学 1 区 外周血管病
JCR分区:
出版当年[2020]版:
Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
最新[2023]版:
Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2020版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2019版] 出版后一年[2021版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]China International Neuroscience Institute (China-INI), Peoples Republic of China [2]Department of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, Peoples Republic of China
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]China International Neuroscience Institute (China-INI), Peoples Republic of China [2]Department of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, Peoples Republic of China [4]Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Peoples Republic of China [*1]Department of Neurosurgery and Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 45 Changchun St, Xicheng District, Beijing, Peoples Republic of China 100053.
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:16996 今日访问量:0 总访问量:905 更新日期:2025-04-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 首都医科大学宣武医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:北京市西城区长椿街45号宣武医院