BackgroundDexmedetomidine has analgesic properties, but the intraoperative analgesic effect of dexmedetomidine is often masked by the effects of other general anaesthetics. Therefore, the degree to which it reduces intraoperative pain intensity remains unclear. The objective of this double-blind, randomised controlled trial was to evaluate the independent intraoperative analgesic efficacy of dexmedetomidine in real-time.MethodsThis single-centre study enrolled 181 patients who were hospitalised for below-knee orthopaedic surgeries between 19 January 2021 to 3 August 2021 were eligible for this is single-centre study. Peripheral neural block was performed on patients scheduled for below-knee orthopaedic surgeries. Patients were randomly assigned to the dexmedetomidine or midazolam group and were intravenously administered with 1.5 mu g kg(-1) h(-1) dexmedetomidine or 50 mu g kg(-1) h(-1) midazolam, respectively. The analgesic efficacy was evaluated using the real-time non-invasive nociception monitoring. The primary endpoint was the attainment rate of the nociception index target. The secondary endpoints included the occurrence of intraoperative hypoxemia, haemodynamic parameters, the consciousness index, electromyography and patient outcomes.ResultsOn Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, the defined nociception index target was attained in 95.45% and 40.91% of patients receiving dexmedetomidine and midazolam, respectively. Log-rank analysis revealed that the dexmedetomidine group attained the nociception index target significantly faster and the median attainment time of the nociception index target in the dexmedetomidine group was 15 min. Dexmedetomidine group was associated with a significantly lower incidence of hypoxemia. There was no significant difference in blood pressure between the dexmedetomidine and midazolam groups. Further, the dexmedetomidine group had a lower maximum visual analogue scale score and lower analgesic consumption postoperatively.ConclusionsDexmedetomidine has independent analgesia and systemically administered as an adjuvant agent has better analgesic efficacy than midazolam without severe side effects.
基金:
Beijing Municipal Medical Science Institute-Public Welfare Development
Reform Pilot; Natural Science Foundation of Beijing; Chinese Academy of
Medical Sciences. Project: (Capital Medical Research No.2019–2) to Guoguang
Zhao; Natural Science Foundation of Beijing (KZ201910025028) and Chinese
Academy of Medical Sciences (2021-JKCS-005) to Hao Wu.
第一作者机构:[1]Capital Med Univ, Xuanwu Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Beijing 100053, Peoples R China[2]Natl Clin Res Ctr Geriatr Disorders, Beijing, Peoples R China
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
通讯机构:[1]Capital Med Univ, Xuanwu Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Beijing 100053, Peoples R China[2]Natl Clin Res Ctr Geriatr Disorders, Beijing, Peoples R China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Wang XiaoHua,Zhang SiYuan,Wang Chunxiu,et al.Real-time evaluation of the independent analgesic efficacy of dexmedetomidine[J].BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY.2023,23(1):doi:10.1186/s12871-023-02022-2.
APA:
Wang, XiaoHua,Zhang, SiYuan,Wang, Chunxiu,Huang, Yi,Wu, Hao...&Wang, TianLong.(2023).Real-time evaluation of the independent analgesic efficacy of dexmedetomidine.BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY,23,(1)
MLA:
Wang, XiaoHua,et al."Real-time evaluation of the independent analgesic efficacy of dexmedetomidine".BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY 23..1(2023)