Stroke Etiology was associated with Tirofiban Efficacy in Acute Ischemic Stroke Without Endovascular Treatment: A Pre-specified Subgroup Analysis of the TREND Trial
机构:[1]Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.神经科系统神经内科首都医科大学宣武医院[2]Beijing Key Laboratory of Hypoxic Conditioning Translational Medicine, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.科技平台低氧适应转化医学北京市重点实验室首都医科大学宣武医院[3]Department of Emergency, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.内科系统急诊科首都医科大学宣武医院[4]Beijing Institute of Brain Disorders, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Different stroke etiologies are associated with varied incidences of early neurological deterioration (END) in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). The TREND trial demonstrated the efficacy of tirofiban in preventing END in patients with AIS. Herein, we conducted a pre-specified subgroup analysis of this trial data to investigate whether stroke etiologies influenced the effects of tirofiban.We performed a pre-specified subgroup analysis of the TREND trial, including 413 patients with AIS classified into large-artery atherosclerosis (n=114), small-vessel occlusion (n=124), and undetermined etiology (n=175). The primary outcome was the incidence of END4 (defined as an increase in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score by ≥4 points) within 72 hours. Other outcomes included END2 (increase in NIHSS score by ≥2 points), early improvement, functional outcomes at 90 days, and safety profiles.Tirofiban significantly reduced the risk of END4 in patients with large-artery atherosclerosis (4.1% vs. 21.5%; adjusted OR 0.17; 95% CI 0.04-0.78; P=0.023), while no significant differences were observed in small-vessel occlusion (adjusted OR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.02-2.67; P=0.248) and undetermined etiology (adjusted OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.18-1.55; P=0.247) subgroups (P for interaction=0.376). Similar trends were observed for END2, with a significant benefit observed in the large-artery atherosclerosis (adjusted OR 0.24; 95% CI 0.08-0.72; P=0.011). The early improvement rates and 90-day functional outcomes were comparable between the treatment groups across all stroke subtypes. Safety outcomes were similar between antiplatelet therapies in each subgroup.In patients who developed ischemic stroke within 24 hours of symptom onset, there was no evidence of a treatment interaction across stroke etiologies when comparing intravenous tirofiban to oral aspirin for reducing END. However, the absolute risk reduction observed with tirofiban was greatest in patients with large-artery atherosclerosis compared to those with small-vessel occlusion or undetermined etiology.
第一作者机构:[1]Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Qiao Yue,Zhao Min,Wang Jing,et al.Stroke Etiology was associated with Tirofiban Efficacy in Acute Ischemic Stroke Without Endovascular Treatment: A Pre-specified Subgroup Analysis of the TREND Trial[J].International Journal Of Stroke : Official Journal Of The International Stroke Society.2025,17474930251326423.doi:10.1177/17474930251326423.
APA:
Qiao Yue,Zhao Min,Wang Jing,Li Sijie,Yang Ting...&Zhao Wenbo.(2025).Stroke Etiology was associated with Tirofiban Efficacy in Acute Ischemic Stroke Without Endovascular Treatment: A Pre-specified Subgroup Analysis of the TREND Trial.International Journal Of Stroke : Official Journal Of The International Stroke Society,,
MLA:
Qiao Yue,et al."Stroke Etiology was associated with Tirofiban Efficacy in Acute Ischemic Stroke Without Endovascular Treatment: A Pre-specified Subgroup Analysis of the TREND Trial".International Journal Of Stroke : Official Journal Of The International Stroke Society .(2025):17474930251326423