当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Adaptive vs Conventional Deep Brain Stimulation of the Subthalamic Nucleus for Treatment of Parkinson's Disease: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

文献详情

资源类型:
Pubmed体系:
机构: [1]Department of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China [2]Department of Neurosurgery, Zhejiang University School of Medicine Second Affiliated Hospital, Hangzhou, China [3]Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China [4]Department of Neurosurgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China [5]Department of Neurosurgery, the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China [6]Department of Neurosurgery, Sanbo Brain Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, China [7]Department of Neurosurgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China [8]Department of Neurosurgery, Tianjin Huanhu Hospital, Tianjin, China [9]Rishena Medical Co, Ltd, Changzhou, China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: Adaptive deep brain stimulation beta oscillation local field potential Parkinson’s disease subthalamic nucleus

摘要:
Conventional deep brain stimulation (cDBS) is an established treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD), whereas adaptive DBS (aDBS) represents a promising approach with potential advantages in minimizing stimulation-induced side effects and enhancing quality of life. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of a newly developed aDBS closed-loop neurostimulation (CNS) device for one year across multiple centers, with the primary objective of comparing the outcomes of aDBS and cDBS.This retrospective study included 62 patients with PD who underwent bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS. Outcomes were assessed using the Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS), Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39), and Schwab and England Activities Scale, whereas the levodopa-equivalent daily dose (LEDD) and adverse events were monitored. This two-phase trial randomized participants into Stim-on or Stim-off groups for 90-day postoperative comparison followed by nonrandomized evaluation of aDBS vs cDBS at 360 days after surgery.At 90 days postoperatively, the Stim-on group exhibited superior outcomes to those in the Stim-off group except for LEDD and speech in the medication-on state. At the 360-day postoperative assessment, the aDBS group showed significantly greater improvements than did the cDBS group in MDS-UPDRS II (57.29% vs 33.02%, p = 0.022), MDS-UPDRS IV (59.83% vs 36.69%, p = 0.026), PDQ-39 (56.91% vs 27.37%, p = 0.031), and LEDD reduction (53.35% vs 29.16%, p = 0.002). CNS aDBS recorded clear STN-beta signals, which could be adopted as a biomarker.Both aDBS and cDBS significantly alleviate motor symptoms and enhance quality of life in patients with PD. Although comparable in motor symptom control, aDBS indicated advantages over cDBS across LEDD reduction, MDS-UPDRS II, MDS-UPDRS IV, and PDQ-39 over the long term. Further studies with extended follow-up and larger sample sizes are required to validate these results.Copyright © 2025 International Neuromodulation Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

基金:
语种:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2025]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 临床神经病学 3 区 医学:研究与实验
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 临床神经病学 3 区 医学:研究与实验
第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Department of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:17630 今日访问量:0 总访问量:938 更新日期:2025-07-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 首都医科大学宣武医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:北京市西城区长椿街45号宣武医院