MGMT promoter methylation is considered as a prognostic and predictive biomarker indicating response to chemotherapy and radiotherapy in glioblastoma. A number of different methods and platforms including pyrosequencing (PSQ), quantitative methylation-specific PCR (qMSP) and immunohistochemistry (IHC), methylation-sensitive high resolution melting (MS-HRM) and NGS (Next Generation Sequencing) have been used to detect MGMT promoter methylation in gliomas. However, controversy remains about the most appropriate method to use for analyzing MGMT status. The MGMT promoter methylation status of a total of 350 gliomas and gangliogliomas was examined using PSQ, qMSP and IHC in parallel. Using PSQ as a recommended standard method, the sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative predictive value and correlation with the other assays were calculated. Among 350 glioma and ganglioglioma cases, the MGMT promoter tested positive for methylation in 53.1%, 55.4%, and 70.3% of the cases by PSQ, qMSP and IHC, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of qMSP were 97.8% and 92.7%, respectively. Twelve cases that tested positive for methylation using qMSP were negative according to PSQ, and four cases that were negative according to qMSP tested positive according to PSQ. The concordance rate between PSQ and qMSP was 90.8%. The sensitivity and specificity of IHC for the detection of MGMT at the protein level were 84.4% and 45.7%, respectively. The concordance rate between PSQ and IHC was 30.8%. This study demonstrated that qMSP is an effective and rapid detection method for routine use in pathology laboratories for the identification of MGMT promoter methylation. A combination of IHC and qMSP assays can provide high sensitivity and specificity for the prediction of MGMT status. A few cases that tested negative with PSQ did harbor MGMT promoter methylation, as confirmed by qMSP and sequencing, and this subgroup of patients may benefit from temozolomide.