当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Drug-Eluting vs. Bare Metal Stents for Symptomatic Vertebral Artery Stenosis

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]Department of Vascular Surgery, XuanWu Hospital, and Institute of Vascular Surgery, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. [2]National Stroke Screening and Intervention Base [3]Beijing Center for Cerebrovascular Diseases, Beijing, China.
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: vertebral artery stenosis drug-eluting stent bare metal stent comparative study vertebrobasilar ischemia in-stent stenosis target vessel revascularization

摘要:
Purpose: To evaluate the immediate and long-term outcomes of drug-eluting stent (DES) vs. bare metal stent (BMS) for symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis (VAS). Methods: From 2003 to 2010, 206 consecutive patients (158 men; mean age 66.8 years) underwent DES (sirolimus-eluting or paclitaxel-eluting) or BMS placement for symptomatic extracranial and intracranial stenoses in 219 vertebral arteries. The technical success, clinical success, periprocedural complications, target vessel revascularization (TVR), and overall survival were compared between the DES and BMS groups. Results: The technical success rate was 98.3% (119/121) for the DES group vs. 100% for the BMS group (p=0.503). The clinical success rate was 95.5% (107/112) for the DES group vs. 97.9% (92/94) for the BMS group (p=0.592). No periprocedural death or stroke occurred. The overall periprocedural complication rate was 2.7% (3/112) in the DES group vs. 4.3% (4/94) in BMS group (p=0.813). The median follow-up was 43 months (range 3-95) for the DES group and 46 months (range 6-89) for BMS. At last follow-up, the TVR rate was 6.3% (7/112) for the DES group vs. 20.2% (19/94) for the BMS group (p=0.003); 4 (3.6%) patients in the DES group and 8 (8.5%) patients in the BMS group experienced a VBS stroke (p=0.132). By life-table analysis, the 5-year TVR rate was 4.5% (5/112) for the DES group vs. 19.1% (18/94) for the BMS group (p=0.001). No difference was detected in the overall survival curves between the groups (p=0.500). Conclusion: Both DES and BMS are feasible, safe, and effective for symptomatic VAS. However, DES can significantly decrease the TVR rate in the long term compared with BMS. J Endovasc Ther. 2012;19:231-238

语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2011]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 2 区 外科 3 区 外周血管病
最新[2023]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 2 区 外科 3 区 外周血管病
JCR分区:
出版当年[2010]版:
Q1 SURGERY Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
最新[2023]版:
Q2 SURGERY Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2010版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2009版] 出版后一年[2011版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Department of Vascular Surgery, XuanWu Hospital, and Institute of Vascular Surgery, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. [2]National Stroke Screening and Intervention Base
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [*1]Department of Vascular Surgery, XuanWu Hospital, and Institute of Vascular Surgery, Capital Medical University, Changchun Street No 45, Beijing 100053, China.
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:16470 今日访问量:0 总访问量:871 更新日期:2025-01-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 首都医科大学宣武医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:北京市西城区长椿街45号宣武医院