当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Mild Behavioral Impairment Checklist for Screening for Alzheimer's Disease.

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [a]Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China [b]Department of Geriatric, Fu Xing Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China [c]Department of Gerontology, Shanghai Jiaotong University Affiliated Sixth People’s Hospital, Shanghai, China [d]Alzheimer’s Disease Research Unit, McGill Centre for Studies in Aging, Verdun, QC, Canada [e]National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: Alzheimer’s disease mild behavioral impairment checklist neuropsychiatric inventory questionnaire reliability validity

摘要:
The Mild Behavioral Impairment Checklist (MBI-C), a screening scale for neuropsychiatric symptom evaluation, facilitates Alzheimer's disease (AD) screening. However, its validity and reliability for use as an AD screening tool have not been determined. To develop an AD screening scale suitable for the Chinese population. The MBI-C was translated into Chinese and back-translated with the original author's consent. Forty-six AD patients, attending the Xuanwu hospital memory clinic, and 50 sex- and education-matched controls from the community underwent a full neuropsychological evaluation, including MBI-C assessment. Among them, 15 AD patients were evaluated repeatedly, and eight were evaluated simultaneously by two different clinicians, to assess MBI-C reliability. The MBI-C demonstrated good internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability, and inter-rater reliability. Its optimal cutoff point was 6/7 for identifying AD dementia, with a sensitivity of 86.96% and specificity of 86.00%, and its detection rate for moderate-severe AD dementia was higher than that of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q). Pearson's correlation coefficients ranged from 0.702 to 0.831, indicating content validity. Seven factors were extracted during principal component analysis, with a cumulative contribution of 70.55%. Moreover, the Pearson's correlation coefficient was 0.758, indicating its criterion validity. The MBI-C could also distinguish AD dementia severity. MBI-C scores were significantly negatively correlated with MMSE and MoCA scores, and positively correlated with ADL scores. This study showed that the Chinese version of MBI-C has high reliability and validity, and could replace the NPI-Q for AD dementia screening in the Chinese population.

基金:
语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2018]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 神经科学
最新[2023]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 神经科学
JCR分区:
出版当年[2017]版:
Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
最新[2023]版:
Q2 NEUROSCIENCES

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2017版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2016版] 出版后一年[2018版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [a]Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [a]Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China [*1]Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, 45 Changchun Street, Beijing, 100053, China [e]National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:16409 今日访问量:0 总访问量:869 更新日期:2025-01-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 首都医科大学宣武医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:北京市西城区长椿街45号宣武医院