Ultra-High Performance Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry for Cyclosporine Analysis in Human Whole Blood and Comparison With an Antibody-Conjugated Magnetic Immunoassay
机构:[1]Department of Pharmacy, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China职能科室医技科室药学部药学部/药剂科首都医科大学附属天坛医院[2]Department of Clinical Pharmacology, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China[3]Department of Pharmacy, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, People’s Republic of China.
Background: Various immunoassays have been used for cyclosporine A (CsA) analysis in human whole blood; however, they could not fully satisfy the requirements of criteria for accuracy and specificity in CsA measurement. The liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry is a gold method for CsA analysis. The aim of the study was to develop and validate an ultra-high performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS) method for CsA analysis and establish its agreement with an antibody-conjugated magnetic immunoassay (ACMIA) in clinical sample analysis. Methods: An UHPLC-MS/MS method for CsA analysis in human whole blood was developed, validated, and applied in 85 samples, which were also tested by ACMIA. The agreement between UHPLC-MS/MS and ACMIA was evaluated by Bland-Altman plot. Results: The calibration range was 5-2000 ng/mL. The inaccuracy and imprecision were 24.60% to 5.56% and less than 8.57%, respectively. The internal standard-normalized recovery and matrix factor were 100.4%-110.5% and 93.5%-107.6%, respectively. The measurements of ACMIA and UHPLC-MS/MS were strongly correlated (r > 0.98). Evaluated by Bland-Altman plot, the 95% limit of agreement of the ACMIA: UHPLC-MS/MS ratio was 88.7%-165.6%, and the mean bias of the ratio was 21.1%. Conclusions: A rapid, simple, accurate, and reliable UHPLC-MS/MS method for CsA analysis in human whole blood was developed, validated, and applied in 85 samples. On average, 21.1% overestimation was observed in ACMIA compared with that in the UHPLC-MS/MS. Further and larger studies are required to identify whether this degree of variance could be accepted by clinicians.
基金:
Department of Pharmacy, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University; Department of Pharmacy, Beijing Hospital
第一作者机构:[1]Department of Pharmacy, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China[2]Department of Clinical Pharmacology, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
通讯机构:[1]Department of Pharmacy, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China[2]Department of Clinical Pharmacology, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China[*1]Department of Pharmacy, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, 6 Tiantan Xili, Dongcheng, Beijing 100050, People’s Republic of China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Shenghui Mei,Jiaqing Wang,Di Chen,et al.Ultra-High Performance Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry for Cyclosporine Analysis in Human Whole Blood and Comparison With an Antibody-Conjugated Magnetic Immunoassay[J].THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING.2018,40(1):69-75.doi:10.1097/FTD.0000000000000477.
APA:
Shenghui Mei,Jiaqing Wang,Di Chen,Leting Zhu,Ming Zhao...&Zhigang Zhao.(2018).Ultra-High Performance Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry for Cyclosporine Analysis in Human Whole Blood and Comparison With an Antibody-Conjugated Magnetic Immunoassay.THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING,40,(1)
MLA:
Shenghui Mei,et al."Ultra-High Performance Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry for Cyclosporine Analysis in Human Whole Blood and Comparison With an Antibody-Conjugated Magnetic Immunoassay".THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING 40..1(2018):69-75