当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Investigation of long-term implantation of BuMA stent in a porcine coronary model

文献详情

资源类型:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE ◇ 统计源期刊 ◇ CSCD-C ◇ 中华系列

机构: [1]Peking Univ, Hosp 1, Dept Cardiol, Beijing 100034, Peoples R China; [2]Beijing Anzhen Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China; [3]Peking Univ, Dept Cardiol, Shougang Hosp, Beijing 100144, Peoples R China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: biodegradable polymer electro-grafting base layer drug-eluting stent porcine coronary model

摘要:
Background Stent-based delivery of sirolimus has been shown to reduce neointimal hyperplasia significantly.However,the long-term effect of the polymer is thought to initiate and sustain an inflammatory response and contribute to the occurrence of late complications.Our study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the BuMA biodegradable drug-coated sirolimus-eluting stent(BSES)for inhibiting neointimal hyperplasia in a porcine coronary model.Methods Four types of stents were implanted at random in different coronary arteries of the same pig:BSES(n=24),bare metal stent(BMS)(n=24),biodegradable polymer coated stent without drug(PCS)(n=24)and only poly(n-butyl methacrylate)base layer coated stent(EGS)(n=23).In total,26 animals underwent successful random placement of 95 oversized stents in the coronary arteries.Coronary angiography was performed after 28 days,90 days and 240 days of stent implantation.After 14 days,28 days,90 days and 240 days,6 animals at each timepoint were sacrificed for histomorphologic analysis.Results The 28-day,90-day and 240-day results of quantitative coronary angiography(QCA)showed reduction in luminal loss(LL)in the BSES group when compared with the BMS group;(0.20±0.35)mm vs.(0.82±0.51)mm(P=0.035),(0.20±0.30)mm vs.(0.93±0.51)mm(P=0.013),and(0.18±0.16)mm vs.(0.19±0.24)mm(P=0.889),respectively.By 28-day,90-day and 240-day histomorphomeric analysis results,there was also a corresponding significant reduction in neointimal tissue proliferation with similar injury scores of BSES compared with the BMS control;average neointimal area(0.90±0.49)mm2 vs.(2.16±1.29)mm2(P=0.049),(1.53±0.84)mm2 vs.(3.41±1.55)mm2(P=0.026),and(2.43±0.95)mm2 vs.(3.12±1.16)mm2(P=0.228),respectively.High magnification histomorphologic examination revealed similar inflammation scores and endothelialization scores in both the BSES and BMS groups.Conclusions The BuMA biodegradable drug-coated sirolimus-eluting stents can significantly reduce neointimal hyperplasia and in-stent restenosis.Re-endothelialization of the BuMA stent is as good as that of the BMS in the porcine coronary model due to the reduced inflammation response to the BuMA stent.

语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2011]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 医学:内科
最新[2023]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 医学:内科
JCR分区:
出版当年[2010]版:
Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
最新[2023]版:
Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2010版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2009版] 出版后一年[2011版]

第一作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

相关文献

[1]Randomized comparison of novel biodegradable polymer and durable polymer-coated cobalt-chromium sirolimus-eluting stents: Three-Year Outcomes of the I-LOVE-IT 2 Trial [2]A Randomized Comparison of Novel Biodegradable Polymer- and Durable Polymer-Coated Cobalt-Chromium Sirolimus-Eluting Stents [3]Two-year safety evaluation of a biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent with increased drug elution and polymer absorption kinetics in complex patient and lesion cohort [4]Biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents versus second-generation drug-eluting stents in patients with and without diabetes mellitus: a single-center study [5]A randomised comparison of a novel abluminal groove-filled biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent with a durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent: clinical and angiographic follow-up of the TARGET I trial [6]Efficacy and safety of a second-generation biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent: One-year results of the CREDIT 2 trial [7]Comparison of drug-eluting balloon with repeat drug-eluting stent for recurrent drug-eluting stent in-stent restenosis. [8]聚合物涂层可降解钴铬合金西罗莫司(雷帕霉素)洗脱支架(EXCEL2)治疗冠心病合并糖尿病患者的有效性与安全性:CREDIT研究亚组分析 [9]Efficacy of drug-eluting balloon versus sirolimus-eluting stent for the treatment of in-stent restenosis [10]Comparison of repeated drug eluting stent for treatment of early and late in-stent restenosis after drug eluting stent implantation

资源点击量:16461 今日访问量:0 总访问量:871 更新日期:2025-01-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 首都医科大学宣武医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:北京市西城区长椿街45号宣武医院