当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Reasons for the Failure of Platelet Function Testing to Adjust Antiplatelet Therapy: Pharmacodynamic Insights From the ARCTIC Study

文献详情

资源类型:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [a]Sorbonne University, ACTION Study Group, INSERM UMRS 1166, Cardiology Institute, Pitié-Salpêtrière (AP-HP) University Hospital, G.M., Paris, United States [b]Cardiology Department, Caremeau University Hospital, ACTION Study Group, Montpellier University, Nîmes [c]Emergency and Critical Care Center, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, China (Y.Y.) [d]Cardiology Department, St. Denis de la Réunion [e]ACTION Study Group, Cardiology Department, La Timone Hospital, Marseille, France [f]Cardiology Department (P.H.), Lariboisière University Hospital, Paris, France [g]ACTION Study Group, Epidemiology and Clinic Research Unit (A.D., Lariboisière University Hospital, Paris, France [h]Cardiology department, Lagny-Marne la Vallée Hospital [i]Cardiology department, Chartres Hospital, Le Coudray, France [j]Cardiology Department, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France [k]Cardiology Department, Bastia Hospital [l]Cardiology Department, Gabriel Montpied University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: clopidogrel myocardial infarction percutaneous coronary intervention platelet function test platelet reactivity thrombosis

摘要:
BACKGROUND: In the ARCTIC trial (Assessment by a Double Randomization of a Conventional Antiplatelet Strategy Versus a Monitoring-Guided Strategy for Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation and of Treatment Interruption Versus Continuation One Year After Stenting), treatment adjustment following platelet function testing failed to improve clinical outcomes. However, high-on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) is considered as a predictor of poor ischemic outcome. This prespecified substudy evaluated clinical outcomes according to the residual platelet reactivity status after antiplatelet therapy adjustment. METHODS: We analyzed the 1213 patients assigned to the monitoring arm of the ARCTIC trial in whom platelet reactivity was evaluated by the VerifyNow P2Y12 test before percutaneous coronary intervention and during the maintenance phase (at 14 days). HPR was defined as platelet reaction unit≥235U. The primary ischemic end point, a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, stroke, or urgent revascularization and the safety end point of major bleeding were assessed according to the platelet reactivity status. RESULTS: Before percutaneous coronary intervention, 35.7% of patients displayed HPR (n=419). During the acute phase, between percutaneous coronary intervention and the 14-day platelet function testing, ischemic (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.74-1.18]; P=0.58) and safety outcomes (hazard ratio, 1.28 [95% CI, 0.22-7.59]; P=0.78) were similar in HPR and non-HPR patients. During the maintenance phase, the proportion of HPR patients (n=186, 17.4%) decreased by 56%. At 1-year, there was no difference for the ischemic end point (5.9% versus 6.0%; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.40-1.58]; P=0.51) and a nonsignificant higher rate of major bleedings (2.7% versus 1.0%, hazard ratio, 2.83 [95% CI, 0.96-8.41]; P=0.06) in HPR versus non-HPR patients. CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of HPR was halved after platelet function testing and treatment adjustment but without significant ischemic benefit at 1 year. HPR seems more as a modifiable risk marker than a risk factor of ischemic outcome. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00827411.

语种:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2018]版:
大类 | 1 区 医学
小类 | 2 区 心脏和心血管系统
最新[2023]版:
大类 | 1 区 医学
小类 | 2 区 心脏和心血管系统
JCR分区:
出版当年[2017]版:
Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
最新[2023]版:
Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2017版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2016版] 出版后一年[2018版]

第一作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:16697 今日访问量:0 总访问量:882 更新日期:2025-02-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 首都医科大学宣武医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:北京市西城区长椿街45号宣武医院