当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Optimal timing of staged percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with multivessel disease

文献详情

资源类型:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE ◇ CSCD-C

机构: [1]Beijing AnzhenHospital,Capital Medical University,Beijing Institute of Heart Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases,Beijing,China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: Myocardial infarction Multivessel disease Non-culprit lesion Percutaneous coronary intervention Timing

摘要:
Background Studies have shown that staged percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for non-culprit lesions is beneficial for prognosis of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with multivessel disease. However, the optimal timing of staged revascularization is still controversial. This study aimed to find the optimal timing of staged revascularization. Methods A total of 428 STEMI patients with multivessel disease who underwent primary PCI and staged PCI were included. According to the time interval between primary and staged PCI, patients were divided into three groups (<= 1 week, 1-2 weeks, and 2-12 weeks after primary PCI). The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of all-cause death, non-fatal re-infarction, repeat revascularization, and stroke. Cox regression model was used to assess the association between staged PCI timing and risk of MACE. Results During the follow-up, 119 participants had MACEs. There was statistical difference in MACE incidence among the three groups (<= 1 week: 23.0%; 1-2 weeks: 33.0%; 2-12 weeks: 40.0%; P = 0.001). In the multivariable adjustment model, the timing interval of staged PCI <= 1 week and 1-2 weeks were both significantly associated with a lower risk of MACE [hazard ratio (HR): 0.40, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.24-0.65; HR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.31-0.93, respectively], mainly attributed to a lower risk of repeat revascularization (HR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.24-0.70; HR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.18-0.7), compared with a strategy of 2-12 weeks later of primary PCI. Conclusions The optimal timing of staged PCI for non-culprit vessels should be within two weeks after primary PCI for STEMI patients.

基金:
语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2017]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 心脏和心血管系统 4 区 老年医学
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 心脏和心血管系统 4 区 老年医学
JCR分区:
出版当年[2016]版:
Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
最新[2023]版:
Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2016版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2015版] 出版后一年[2017版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Beijing AnzhenHospital,Capital Medical University,Beijing Institute of Heart Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases,Beijing,China
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]Beijing AnzhenHospital,Capital Medical University,Beijing Institute of Heart Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases,Beijing,China [*1]Emergency& Cfitical Care Center, Beijing Anzhen Hospiml,Capital Medical University,No.2 Anzhen Road, Chaoyang District,Beijing 100029,China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

相关文献

[1]Culprit Vessel Only versus Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients Presenting with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease [2]Timing selection of delayed percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation of myocardial infarction [3]Stenting versus non-stenting treatment of intermediate stenosis culprit lesion in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. [4]Staged complete revascularization or culprit-only percutaneous coronary intervention for multivessel coronary artery disease in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and diabetes [5]Culprit Vessel Only versus Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients Presenting with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease (vol 9, e92316, 2014) [6]Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Staged Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Coronary Disease [7]Culprit vessel only versus "one-week" staged percutaneous coronary intervention for multivessel disease in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction [8]缺血后适应对急性心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入术后非罪犯血管病变进展的抑制作用 [9]急性心肌梗死非靶血管病变早期介入治疗患者的长期预后分析 [10]FFR Versus Angiography-Guided Strategy for Management of AMI With Multivessel Disease

资源点击量:16991 今日访问量:1 总访问量:905 更新日期:2025-04-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 首都医科大学宣武医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:北京市西城区长椿街45号宣武医院