Stenting versus non-stenting treatment of intermediate stenosis culprit lesion in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a multicenter randomized clinical trial.
机构:[1]Department of Cardiology, Capital Medical University Affiliated Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Beijing Institute of Heart Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Beijing, China.临床科室心脏内科中心首都医科大学附属安贞医院[2]Department of Cardiology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.[3]Department of Cardiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.[4]Department of Cardiology, the First Bethune Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China.[5]Department of Cardiology, Daqing Oilfield General Hospital, Daqing, Heilongjiang, China.[6]Department of Cardiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumchi, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China.[7]Department of Cardiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.[8]Department of Cardiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.[9]Department of Cardiology, the First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
The benefit/risk ratio of stenting in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with single vessel intermediate stenosis culprit lesions merits further study, therefore the subject of the present study.
It was a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Between April 2012 and July 2015, 399 acute STEMI patients with single vessel disease and intermediate (40%-70%) stenosis of the culprit lesion before or after aspiration thrombectomy and/or intracoronary tirofiban (15 µg/kg) were enrolled and were randomly assigned (1: 1) to stenting group (n = 201) and non-stenting group (n = 198). In stenting group, patients received pharmacologic therapy plus standard percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stent implantation. In non-stenting group, patients received pharmacologic therapy and PCI (thrombectomy), but without dilatation or stenting. Primary endpoint was 12-month rate of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), repeat revascularization and stroke. Secondary endpoints were 12-month rates of all cause death, ischemia driven admission and bleeding complication. Median follow-up time was 12.4 ± 3.1 months. At 12 months, MACCE occurred in 8.0% of the patients in stenting group, as compared with 15.2% in the non-stenting group (adjusted HR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.19-0.89, P = 0.02). The stenting group had lower non-fatal MI rate than non-stenting group, (1.5% vs. 5.5%, P = 0.03). The two groups shared similar cardiac death, repeat revascularization, stroke, all cause death, ischemia driven readmission and bleeding rates at 12 months.
Stent implantation had better efficacy and safety in reducing MACCE risks among acute STEMI patients with single vessel intermediate stenosis culprit lesions.
基金:
Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China, State Science and Technology Support Program [2011BAI11B05]
第一作者机构:[1]Department of Cardiology, Capital Medical University Affiliated Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Beijing Institute of Heart Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Beijing, China.
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Dai Jing,Lyu Shu-Zheng,Chen Yun-Dai,et al.Stenting versus non-stenting treatment of intermediate stenosis culprit lesion in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a multicenter randomized clinical trial.[J].Journal of Geriatric Cardiology.2017,14(2):108-117.doi:10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2017.02.005.
APA:
Dai Jing,Lyu Shu-Zheng,Chen Yun-Dai,Song Xian-Tao,Zhang Min...&Zhang Zheng.(2017).Stenting versus non-stenting treatment of intermediate stenosis culprit lesion in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a multicenter randomized clinical trial..Journal of Geriatric Cardiology,14,(2)
MLA:
Dai Jing,et al."Stenting versus non-stenting treatment of intermediate stenosis culprit lesion in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a multicenter randomized clinical trial.".Journal of Geriatric Cardiology 14..2(2017):108-117