当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Stenting versus non-stenting treatment of intermediate stenosis culprit lesion in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a multicenter randomized clinical trial.

文献详情

资源类型:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE ◇ CSCD-C

机构: [1]Department of Cardiology, Capital Medical University Affiliated Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Beijing Institute of Heart Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Beijing, China. [2]Department of Cardiology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China. [3]Department of Cardiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China. [4]Department of Cardiology, the First Bethune Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China. [5]Department of Cardiology, Daqing Oilfield General Hospital, Daqing, Heilongjiang, China. [6]Department of Cardiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumchi, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China. [7]Department of Cardiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China. [8]Department of Cardiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China. [9]Department of Cardiology, the First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: Acute myocardial infarction Anti-thrombotic therapy Clinical trial Primary percutaneous coronary intervention Stent ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

摘要:
The benefit/risk ratio of stenting in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with single vessel intermediate stenosis culprit lesions merits further study, therefore the subject of the present study. It was a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Between April 2012 and July 2015, 399 acute STEMI patients with single vessel disease and intermediate (40%-70%) stenosis of the culprit lesion before or after aspiration thrombectomy and/or intracoronary tirofiban (15 µg/kg) were enrolled and were randomly assigned (1: 1) to stenting group (n = 201) and non-stenting group (n = 198). In stenting group, patients received pharmacologic therapy plus standard percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stent implantation. In non-stenting group, patients received pharmacologic therapy and PCI (thrombectomy), but without dilatation or stenting. Primary endpoint was 12-month rate of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), repeat revascularization and stroke. Secondary endpoints were 12-month rates of all cause death, ischemia driven admission and bleeding complication. Median follow-up time was 12.4 ± 3.1 months. At 12 months, MACCE occurred in 8.0% of the patients in stenting group, as compared with 15.2% in the non-stenting group (adjusted HR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.19-0.89, P = 0.02). The stenting group had lower non-fatal MI rate than non-stenting group, (1.5% vs. 5.5%, P = 0.03). The two groups shared similar cardiac death, repeat revascularization, stroke, all cause death, ischemia driven readmission and bleeding rates at 12 months. Stent implantation had better efficacy and safety in reducing MACCE risks among acute STEMI patients with single vessel intermediate stenosis culprit lesions.

基金:
语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2016]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 心脏和心血管系统 4 区 老年医学
最新[2023]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 心脏和心血管系统 4 区 老年医学
JCR分区:
出版当年[2015]版:
Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
最新[2023]版:
Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2015版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2014版] 出版后一年[2016版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Department of Cardiology, Capital Medical University Affiliated Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Beijing Institute of Heart Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Beijing, China.
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

相关文献

[1]Comparison of Left and Right Radial Approach for Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients [2]Incidence, predictors and prognosis of acute kidney injury in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing emergent coronary angiography/primary percutaneous coronary intervention [3]Effect of Coronary Collaterals on Prognosis in Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-Analysis [4]Development and Validation of a Clinical Risk Score Predicting the No-Reflow Phenomenon in Patients Treated with Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction [5]Efficacy of comprehensive remote ischemic conditioning in elderly patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention [6]Prognostic Value of the Leukocyte Count on Admission in Patients with Acute ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [7]A Risk Score for No Reflow in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [8]高剂量盐酸替罗非班在急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的应用 [9]Correlations between Serum Inflammation Factors and Left Ventricular Remodeling in Acute ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction [10]Benefit from deferred stent in patients with acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction and with high thrombus burden

资源点击量:16409 今日访问量:0 总访问量:869 更新日期:2025-01-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 首都医科大学宣武医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:北京市西城区长椿街45号宣武医院