Comparison Between Clinically Available Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound (LIPUS) and a Novel Bimodal Acoustic Signal System for Accelerating Fracture Healing
机构:[1]Thomas Jefferson Univ, Dept Radiol, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA[2]Capital Med Univ, Xuanwu Hosp, Beijing 100053, Peoples R China首都医科大学宣武医院[3]Thomas Jefferson Univ, Sidney Kimmel Med Coll, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA[4]Rothman Inst, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA[5]Sonogen Med Inc, Chevy Chase, MD 20815 USA
Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) accelerates fracture healing by stimulating the production of bone callus and the mineralization process. This study compared a novel bimodal acoustic signal (BMAS) device for bone fracture healing to a clinical LIPUS system (EXOGEN; Bioventus, Durham, NC, USA). Thirty rabbits underwent a bilateral fibular osteotomy. Each rabbits' legs were randomized to receive 20-min treatment daily for 18 days with BMAS or LIPUS. The latter utilizes a longitudinal ultrasonic mode only, while the former employs ultrasound-induced shear stress to promote bone formation. Power Doppler imaging (PDI) was acquired days 0, 2, 4, 7, 11, 14, and 18 post-surgery to monitor treatment response and quantified off-line. X-rays were acquired to evaluate fractures on days 0, 14, 18, and 21. Seventeen rabbits completed the study and were euthanized day 21 post-surgery. The fibulae were analyzed to determine maximum torque, initial torsional stiffness, and angular displacement at failure. ANOVAs and paired t-tests were used to compare pair-wise outcome variables for the two treatment modes on a per rabbit basis. The BMAS system induced better fracture healing with greater stiffness (BMAS 0.21 +/- 0.19 versus LIPUS 0.16 +/- 0.19 N.cm/degrees, p = 0.050) and maximum torque (BMAS 7.84 +/- 5.55 versus LIPUS 6.26 +/- 3.46 N.cm, p = 0.022) than the LIPUS system. Quantitative PDI assessments showed a higher amount of vascularity with LIPUS than BMAS on days 4 and 18 (p < 0.04). In conclusion, the novel BMAS technique achieved better bone fracture healing response than the current Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved LIPUS system.
基金:
Innovation Pillar Center; Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
第一作者机构:[1]Thomas Jefferson Univ, Dept Radiol, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
通讯作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Machado Priscilla,Li Jingzhi,Blackman Rachel,et al.Comparison Between Clinically Available Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound (LIPUS) and a Novel Bimodal Acoustic Signal System for Accelerating Fracture Healing[J].IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ULTRASONICS FERROELECTRICS AND FREQUENCY CONTROL.2022,69(2):629-636.doi:10.1109/TUFFC.2021.3130554.
APA:
Machado, Priscilla,Li, Jingzhi,Blackman, Rachel,Liu, Ji-Bin,Kepler, Christopher K....&Forsberg, Flemming.(2022).Comparison Between Clinically Available Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound (LIPUS) and a Novel Bimodal Acoustic Signal System for Accelerating Fracture Healing.IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ULTRASONICS FERROELECTRICS AND FREQUENCY CONTROL,69,(2)
MLA:
Machado, Priscilla,et al."Comparison Between Clinically Available Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound (LIPUS) and a Novel Bimodal Acoustic Signal System for Accelerating Fracture Healing".IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ULTRASONICS FERROELECTRICS AND FREQUENCY CONTROL 69..2(2022):629-636