当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Immediate clinical outcomes of left bundle branch area pacing vs conventional right ventricular pacing

文献详情

资源类型:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China [2]Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China [3]The Key Laboratory of Remodeling-Related Cardiovascular Diseases, Capital Medical University, Ministry of Education, Beijing Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Beijing, China [4]Department of Ultrasound, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: left bundle branch area pacing physiological pacing QRS complex right ventricular pacing

摘要:
Background Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBaP) is a new physiological pacing strategy that produces comparable clinical effects to His bundle pacing (HBP). Objective The purpose of this study was to investigate the immediate clinical outcomes of LBBaP vs RVP. Methods and Results From April 2018 to September 2018, we included 44 patients under continuous pacemaker implantation. Patients were randomly divided into the LBBaP group and conventional RVP group. Compared to the RVP group, the LBBaP group displayed significantly increased operative (90.10 +/- 19.68 minutes vs 61.57 +/- 6.62 minutes, P < .001) and X-ray exposure times (15.55 +/- 5.62 minutes vs 4.67 +/- 2.06 minutes, P < .001). The lead threshold of the LBBaP group was increased (0.68 +/- 0.20 mV vs 0.51 +/- 0.0 mV, P = .001), while the R-wave amplitude and ventricular impedance did not significantly differ between the two groups. The conventional RVP procedure significantly widened the QRS complex (93.62 +/- 8.28 ms vs 135.19 +/- 12.21 ms, P = .001), whereas the LBBaP had no effect on QRS complex (130.13 +/- 43.30 ms vs 112.63 +/- 12.14 ms, P = .904). Furthermore, the LBBaP procedure significantly narrowed the QRS complex in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) (168.43 +/- 38.870 ms vs 119.86 +/- 6.69 ms, P = .019). Conclusion LBBaP is a new physiological, safe and effective pacing procedure with a high overall success rate. Compared to conventional RVP, LBBaP can correct LBBB, thereby improving cardiac electrical dyssynchrony.

基金:
语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2018]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 心脏和心血管系统
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 心脏和心血管系统
JCR分区:
出版当年[2017]版:
Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
最新[2024]版:
Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS

影响因子: 最新[2024版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2017版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2016版] 出版后一年[2018版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China [*1]Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:18209 今日访问量:0 总访问量:997 更新日期:2025-10-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 首都医科大学宣武医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:北京市西城区长椿街45号宣武医院