机构:[a]McGill Center for Studies in Aging, Montreal, Que., Canada[b]National Disease Medical Research Unit, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Tlacotalpan , México[c]Department of Neurology, Xuan Wu Hospital of the Capital Medical University, Beijing , China神经内科首都医科大学宣武医院[d]Department of Geriatric Psychiatry, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim[e]idv Data Analysis and Study Planning,Department of Biometry and Clinical Research, Krailling , Germany[f]EVER Neuro Pharma GmbH, Unterach , Austria
Objective: The aim of this study was to provide a systematic and quantitative summary of benefit and risk of Cerebrolysin in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD) and to avoid major deficiencies of an earlier meta-analysis. Design: This is a meta-analysis of randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trials. Data Sources: Trials were identified with the help of PubMed, the Cochrane Dementia Group database, the Center for Collaborative Neurosciences, and references from reviews; no language restrictions were applied. Study Selection: All randomized double-blind placebo-controlled studies on 30 ml/day of Cerebrolysin in mild-to-moderate AD were included. Results: There were 6 eligible randomized controlled trials comparing Cerebrolysin with placebo. For all studies, either individual patient data and/or published data (aggregate data) were available. Analyses were based on the odds ratio (OR) for dichotomized global clinical change and for safety criteria, on the standardized mean difference (SMD) for pooling of cognitive function, and on the Mann-Whitney statistic (MW) for multivariate analysis of 'global benefit' (combined effect of global clinical change and cognitive function). Cerebrolysin was significantly more effective than placebo at 4 weeks regarding cognitive function (4 weeks: SMD -0.40 points; 95% CI -0.66 to -0.13; p = 0.0031; 6 months: SMD -0.37 points; 95% CI -0.90 to 0.16; p = 0.1710), at 4 weeks and 6 months regarding global clinical change (4 weeks: OR 3.32; 95% CI 1.20-9.21; p = 0.0212; 6 months: OR 4.98; 95% CI 1.37-18.13; p = 0.0150), and at 4 weeks and 6 months regarding 'global benefit' (combined efficacy criteria; 4 weeks: MW 0.57, 95% CI 0.53-0.61; p = 0.0006; 6 months: MW 0.57; 95% CI 0.53-0.61; p = 0.0010). The safety aspects of Cerebrolysin were comparable to placebo. Conclusion: This meta-analysis provides evidence that Cerebrolysin has an overall beneficial effect and a favorable benefit-risk ratio in patients with mild-to-moderate AD. Cerebrolysin as a therapeutic agent should be considered by clinicians seeking treatment options for mild-to-moderate AD. (C) 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel
基金:
Axon Neuroscience; Boehringer Ingelheim; Eisai; Eli Lilly; GE Health Care; Lundbeck; Merck Sharpe and Dohme; Merz Pharma; Novartis; Nutricia; Otsuka; Pfizer; Roche; Sanofi-Aventis; Schering-Plough
第一作者机构:[a]McGill Center for Studies in Aging, Montreal, Que., Canada[*1]McGill Center for Studies in Aging 6825 LaSalle Boulevard Montreal, QC H4H 1R3 (Canada)
通讯作者:
通讯机构:[*1]McGill Center for Studies in Aging 6825 LaSalle Boulevard Montreal, QC H4H 1R3 (Canada)
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Serge Gauthier,Jefferson Voltaire Proano,Jianping Jia,et al.Cerebrolysin in Mild-to-Moderate Alzheimer's Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials[J].DEMENTIA AND GERIATRIC COGNITIVE DISORDERS.2015,39(5-6):332-347.doi:10.1159/000377672.
APA:
Serge Gauthier,Jefferson Voltaire Proano,Jianping Jia,Lutz Froelich,Johannes Christophe Vester&Edith Doppler.(2015).Cerebrolysin in Mild-to-Moderate Alzheimer's Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials.DEMENTIA AND GERIATRIC COGNITIVE DISORDERS,39,(5-6)
MLA:
Serge Gauthier,et al."Cerebrolysin in Mild-to-Moderate Alzheimer's Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials".DEMENTIA AND GERIATRIC COGNITIVE DISORDERS 39..5-6(2015):332-347