机构:[1]Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing重点科室诊疗科室神经外科神经外科首都医科大学附属天坛医院[2]China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing[3]Center of Stroke, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Beijing[4]Beijing Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine for Cerebrovascular Disease, Beijing[5]Department of Neurosurgery, Peoples Hospital of Beijing Daxing District, Capital Medical University, Beijing[6]Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, Beijing Neurosurgical Institute and Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China重点科室医技科室研究所放射科放射科北京市神经外科研究所首都医科大学附属天坛医院
BACKGROUND: Recurrent intracranial aneurysms (RAs) remain a daunting challenge for neurosurgeons. This study aimed to explore a potential optimal management strategy of RAs by reviewing the characteristics and management outcomes of 117 RAs. METHODS: A total of 117 patients with RAs were treated in a single neurosurgical center from January 2011 to January 2017. The demographic and angiographic characteristics of the patients, treatment approaches, and follow-up outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 117 patients with RAs, 16 (13.7%) and 101 (86.3%) initially underwent microsurgical clipping and endovascular coiling, respectively. Coil embolization was used in 75 cases, microsurgical clipping was used in 32 cases, and conservative treatment occurred in 10 cases. Complete clipping was achieved in all 32 aneurysms by microsurgery, and remnants were observed in 25 aneurysms after coiling (33.3%, P < 0.001). Operation-related cerebral infarction occurred in 4 cases (12.5%) with complex and large RA in the clipping group and in 1.3% (1/75) of patients treated with coiling (P = 0.027). Follow-up found similar favorable outcomes in patients after coiling, clipping, and conservative treatment (90.3% vs. 86.7% vs. 80%, respectively; P = 0.711). Follow-up rates of recurrence were significantly higher in the coiling group than the clipping group (26% vs. 0%, respectively; P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The follow-up outcomes appeared to be acceptable and comparable between the 2 groups. However, in large or giant recurrent aneurysms, sound judgment and the careful selection of treatment are strongly suggested because direct microsurgery has a higher morbidity, even in experienced hands, whereas endovascular coiling is complicated with a higher incomplete occlusion rate.
基金:
China National Clinical Research Center for Neurosurgical Diseases [2015BAI12804]
第一作者机构:[1]Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing[2]China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing[3]Center of Stroke, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Beijing[4]Beijing Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine for Cerebrovascular Disease, Beijing
通讯作者:
通讯机构:[1]Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing[2]China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing[3]Center of Stroke, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Beijing[4]Beijing Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine for Cerebrovascular Disease, Beijing
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Le-Bao Yu,Zhi-Jun Fang,Xin-Jian Yang,et al.Management of Residual and Recurrent Aneurysms After Clipping or Coiling: Clinical Characteristics, Treatments, and Follow-Up Outcomes[J].WORLD NEUROSURGERY.2019,122:E838-E846.doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2018.10.160.
APA:
Le-Bao Yu,Zhi-Jun Fang,Xin-Jian Yang&Dong Zhang.(2019).Management of Residual and Recurrent Aneurysms After Clipping or Coiling: Clinical Characteristics, Treatments, and Follow-Up Outcomes.WORLD NEUROSURGERY,122,
MLA:
Le-Bao Yu,et al."Management of Residual and Recurrent Aneurysms After Clipping or Coiling: Clinical Characteristics, Treatments, and Follow-Up Outcomes".WORLD NEUROSURGERY 122.(2019):E838-E846