Efficacy of standard prophylaxis versus on-demand treatment with bayer's sucrose-formulated recombinant FVIII (rFVIII-FS) in Chinese children with severe hemophilia A
机构:[1]Beijing Union Med Coll Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China;[2]Chinese Acad Med Sci, Inst Hematol, Tianjin, Peoples R China;[3]Chinese Acad Med Sci, Blood Dis Hosp, Tianjin, Peoples R China;[4]Peking Union Med Coll, Tianjin, Peoples R China;[5]Beijing Childrens Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China;首都医科大学附属北京儿童医院[6]Capital Med Univ, Beijing, Peoples R China;[7]Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Union Hosp, Tongji Med Coll, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China;[8]Bayer AG, Wuppertal, Germany;[9]Bayer, Beijing, Peoples R China;[10]Southern Med Univ, Nanfang Hosp, 1838,North Guangzhou Ave, Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong, Peoples R China
In China, care of patients with severe hemophilia primarily involves insufficient dosing of on-demand treatment and secondary low-dose prophylaxis (10IU/kg 2x /wk). We sought to evaluate 3x /wk, standard-dose prophylaxis with sucrose-formulated recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII-FS; Bayer) compared with on-demand treatment in Chinese children with severe hemophilia A. Children and adolescents aged 2-16years with severe hemophilia A, no inhibitors, and no prophylaxis for >6 consecutive months before study entry were eligible for this 24-week, interventional, sequential-treatment study. Patients received rFVIII-FS on demand for 12weeks followed by a 12-week prophylaxis period (25IU/kg 3x /wk). The primary efficacy endpoint was comparison of the annualized bleeding rate (ABR) of all bleeds in the prophylaxis versus on-demand phase. Additional variables included ABR of joint bleeds, school attendance/activity, daily activity, and hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS). Thirty patients (median age, 12years) were treated and analyzed. Compared with on-demand treatment, prophylaxis reduced median (quartile [Q1; Q3]) ABR of all bleeds (57.5 [44.5; 73.9] vs 0 [0; 4.0]) and joint bleeds (34.5 [26.1; 56.5] vs 0 [0; 4.0]). Median (range) total HJHS improved after both the prophylaxis and on-demand phases (8.0 [0-48.0] and 11.0 [0-55.0], respectively) compared with baseline (16.0 [0-56.0]). School attendance/activity and daily activity improved with prophylaxis versus on demand. No inhibitors or treatment-related adverse events were reported. In this first prospective, standard-dose, secondary prophylaxis study in China, rFVIII-FS prophylaxis reduced bleeding and improved health outcomes versus on-demand treatment in children with severe hemophilia A.
基金:
Bayer AG (Leverkusen, Germany)Bayer AG; BayerBayer AG
第一作者机构:[1]Beijing Union Med Coll Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China;
通讯作者:
通讯机构:[10]Southern Med Univ, Nanfang Hosp, 1838,North Guangzhou Ave, Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong, Peoples R China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Zhao Yongqiang,Xiao Juan,Yang Renchi,et al.Efficacy of standard prophylaxis versus on-demand treatment with bayer's sucrose-formulated recombinant FVIII (rFVIII-FS) in Chinese children with severe hemophilia A[J].PEDIATRIC HEMATOLOGY AND ONCOLOGY.2017,34(3):138-148.doi:10.1080/08880018.2017.1313921.
APA:
Zhao, Yongqiang,Xiao, Juan,Yang, Renchi,Wu, Runhui,Hu, Yu...&Sun, Jing.(2017).Efficacy of standard prophylaxis versus on-demand treatment with bayer's sucrose-formulated recombinant FVIII (rFVIII-FS) in Chinese children with severe hemophilia A.PEDIATRIC HEMATOLOGY AND ONCOLOGY,34,(3)
MLA:
Zhao, Yongqiang,et al."Efficacy of standard prophylaxis versus on-demand treatment with bayer's sucrose-formulated recombinant FVIII (rFVIII-FS) in Chinese children with severe hemophilia A".PEDIATRIC HEMATOLOGY AND ONCOLOGY 34..3(2017):138-148