资源类型:
期刊
收录情况:
◇ 统计源期刊
◇ CSCD-C
文章类型:
论著
作者:
Lin, L[]
*
;
Wang, Y.-N[]
;
Kong, L.-Y[]
;
Jin, Z.-Y[]
;
Lu, G.-M[]
;
Zhang, Z.-Q[]
;
Cao, J[]
;
Li, S[]
;
Song, L[]
;
Wang, Z.-W[]
;
Zhou, K[]
;
Wang, M[]
;
机构:
[a]Department of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
[b]Department of Radiology, Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Command, Nangjing 200012, China
[c]Department of Radiology, Anzhen Hospital, Affiliated to the Capital Medicine of University, Beijing 100029, China
医技科室
医学影像科
首都医科大学附属安贞医院
ISSN:
1001-9294
关键词:
atrial fibrillation
computed tomography
coronary angiography
prospectively electrocardiogram-triggered sequential scan
摘要:
Objective: To evaluate the image quality (IQ) and radiation dose of 128-slice dual-source computed tomography (DSCT) coronary angiography using prospectively electrocardiogram (ECG)-triggered sequential scan mode compared with ECG-gated spiral scan mode in a population with atrial fibrillation. Methods: Thirty-two patients with suspected coronary artery disease and permanent atrial fibrillation referred for a second-generation 128-slice DSCT coronary angiography were included in the prospective study. Of them, 17 patients (sequential group) were randomly selected to use a prospectively ECG-triggered sequential scan, while the other 15 patients (spiral group) used a retrospectively ECG-gated spiral scan. The IQ was assessed by two readers independently, using a four-point grading scale from excellent (grade 1) to non-Assessable (grade 4), based on the American Heart Association 15-segment model. IQ of each segment and effective dose of each patient were compared between the two groups. Results: The mean heart rate (HR) of the sequential group was 96±27 beats per minute (bpm) with a variation range of 73±25 bpm, while the mean HR of the spiral group was 86±22 bpm with a variation range of 65±24 bpm. Both of the mean HR (t=1.91, p=0.243) and HR variation range (t=0.950, P=0.350) had no significant difference between the two groups. In per-segment analysis, IQ of the sequential group vs. spiral group was rated as excellent (grade 1) in 190/244 (78%) vs. 177/217 (82%) by reader1 and 197/245 (80%) vs. 174/214 (81%) by reader2, as non-Assessable (grade 4) in 4/244 (2%) vs. 2/217 (1%) by reader1 and 6/245 (2%) vs. 4/214 (2%) by reader2. Overall averaged IQ per-patient in the sequential and spiral group showed equally good (1.27±0.19 vs. 1.25±0.22, Z=-0.834, P=0.404). The effective radiation dose of the sequential group reduced significantly compared with the spiral group (4.88±1.77 mSv vs. 10.20±3.64 mSv; t=-5.372, P=0.000). Conclusion: Compared with retrospectively ECG-gated spiral scan, prospectively ECG-triggered sequential DSCT coronary angiography provides similarly diagnostically valuable images in patients with atrial fibrillation and significantly reduces radiation dose. © 2012 Chinese Academy Medical Sciences.
第一作者:
Lin, L
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Lin L,Wang Y.-N,Kong L.-Y,et al.128-Slice dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with atrial fibrillation: Image quality and radiation dose of prospectively electrocardiogram-triggered sequential scan compared with retrospectively electrocardiogram-gated spiral scan[J].2012,27(4):doi:10.1016/S1001-9294(13)60001-2.
APA:
Lin, L,Wang, Y.-N,Kong, L.-Y,Jin, Z.-Y,Lu, G.-M...&Wang, M.(2012).128-Slice dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with atrial fibrillation: Image quality and radiation dose of prospectively electrocardiogram-triggered sequential scan compared with retrospectively electrocardiogram-gated spiral scan.,27,(4)
MLA:
Lin, L,et al."128-Slice dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with atrial fibrillation: Image quality and radiation dose of prospectively electrocardiogram-triggered sequential scan compared with retrospectively electrocardiogram-gated spiral scan". 27..4(2012)