当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Pipeline Embolization Device for the Treatment of Ruptured Intracerebral Aneurysms: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]Department of Neurosurgery, Institute of Brain and Brain-Inspired Science, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Shandong University, Jinan, China [2]Shandong Key Laboratory of Brain Function Remodeling, Shandong University, Jinan, China, [3]Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China [4]Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China [5]First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China [6]Peking University International Hospital, Beijing, China [7]Shanghai Donglei Brain Hospital, Shanghai, China [8]First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China [9]Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China [10]First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: intracerebral aneurysm pipeline embolization device flow diversion subarachnoid hemorrhage complication

摘要:
Background and Purpose: The utilization of flow diversion for ruptured intracerebral aneurysms (IAs) is still limited. We aimed to demonstrate our multicenter experience using the pipeline embolization device (PED) for ruptured IAs that were difficult to treat by clipping and coiling. Methods: Thirty-eight patients with ruptured IAs who underwent PED treatment from 2015 to 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Factors associated with procedure-related stroke (ischemic and hemorrhagic) and clinical and angiography outcomes were analyzed. Results: There were 14 (36.8%) saccular IAs, 12 (31.6%) blister-like IAs, and 12 (31.6%) dissecting IAs. Perforator involvement was noted in 10 (26.3%) IAs. Early PED placement ( ≤ 15 days) and adjunctive coiling treatment were performed in 27 (71.1%) and 22 (57.9%) cases, respectively. The overall rate of stroke-related complications was 31.6% (12/38) (including rates of 10.5% for procedure-related hemorrhagic complications and 15.8% for procedure-related infarction). The mortality rate was 13.2% (5/38), and 84.2% of patients (32/38) had favorable outcomes. Thirty-two (84.2%) patients underwent follow-up angiographic evaluations; of these, 84.4% (27 patients) had complete occlusion and 15.6% had incomplete obliteration. Multivariate analysis revealed that early PED placement was not associated with a high risk of procedure-related stroke or an unfavorable outcome. Adjunctive coiling exhibited an association with procedure-related stroke (p = 0.073). Procedure-related hemorrhagic complications were significantly associated with an unfavorable outcome (p = 0.003). Immediate contrast stasis in the venous phase was associated with complete occlusion during follow-up (p = 0.050). Conclusion: The PED is a feasible and effective treatment to prevent rebleeding and achieve aneurysm occlusion, but it is associated with a substantial risk of periprocedural hemorrhage and ischemic complications in acute ruptured IAs. Therefore, the PED should be used selectively for acutely ruptured IAs. Additionally, adjunctive coiling might increase procedure-related stroke; however, it may reduce aneurysm rebleeding in acutely ruptured IAs. Patients with immediate contrast stasis in the venous phase were more likely to achieve total occlusion. A prospective study with a larger sample size should be performed to verify our results.Copyright © 2021 Zhong, Kuang, Zhang, Yang, Luo, Maimaitili, Zhao, Song, Guan, Zhang, Wang, Wang, Su and Wang.

基金:
语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2020]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 临床神经病学 3 区 神经科学
最新[2023]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 临床神经病学 3 区 神经科学
JCR分区:
出版当年[2019]版:
Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
最新[2023]版:
Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Q3 NEUROSCIENCES

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2019版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2018版] 出版后一年[2020版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Department of Neurosurgery, Institute of Brain and Brain-Inspired Science, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Shandong University, Jinan, China [2]Shandong Key Laboratory of Brain Function Remodeling, Shandong University, Jinan, China,
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]Department of Neurosurgery, Institute of Brain and Brain-Inspired Science, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Shandong University, Jinan, China [2]Shandong Key Laboratory of Brain Function Remodeling, Shandong University, Jinan, China,
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:16409 今日访问量:0 总访问量:869 更新日期:2025-01-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 首都医科大学宣武医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:北京市西城区长椿街45号宣武医院